Harold T. Hodes
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Henk BarendregtMilton K. MunitzDavid BostockMichael DummettPeter SimonsRobin SmithDavid HoldcroftGarry J. Tee
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers)Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceComputational Theory and MathematicsHistory and Philosophy of Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Harold T. Hodes
25 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Artificial Intelligence 393
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 309
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
- Philosophy 96
- History and Philosophy of Science 79
Countries citing papers authored by Harold T. Hodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Harold T. Hodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold T. Hodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold T. Hodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harold T. Hodes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold T. Hodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold T. Hodes. The network helps show where Harold T. Hodes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harold T. Hodes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harold T. Hodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harold T. Hodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harold T. Hodes. Harold T. Hodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Harold T. Hodes
Harold T. Hodes is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (26 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (309 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (79 citations). Harold T. Hodes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Henk Barendregt, Milton K. Munitz, David Bostock, Michael Dummett, Peter Simons, Robin Smith, David Holdcroft and Garry J. Tee. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The Philosophical Review and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.