W. W. Tait
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Leonard LinskyG. KreiselØystein LinneboGaisi TakeutiDonald A. MartinCarl G. JockuschJohn T. BaldwinRobert I. Soare
- Topics
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceHistory and Philosophy of ScienceComputational Theory and Mathematics
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewThe Journal of PhilosophyBulletin of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
W. W. Tait
26 papers receiving 533 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Artificial Intelligence 381
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 355
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 161
- Theoretical Computer Science 114
- History and Philosophy of Science 102
Countries citing papers authored by W. W. Tait
This map shows the geographic impact of W. W. Tait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. W. Tait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. W. Tait more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. W. Tait
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. W. Tait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. W. Tait. The network helps show where W. W. Tait may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. W. Tait
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. W. Tait. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. W. Tait based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. W. Tait. W. W. Tait is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | The Provenance of Pure Reason: Essays in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Its History | 21 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | The Iterative Hierarchy of Sets | 3 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 85 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 256 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About W. W. Tait
W. W. Tait is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (114 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (102 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (355 citations). W. W. Tait has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Linsky, G. Kreisel, Øystein Linnebo, Gaisi Takeuti, Donald A. Martin, Carl G. Jockusch, John T. Baldwin and Robert I. Soare. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.