Hans H. Jung
- Neurology top 2%
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 9
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 9
- Hematology top 5%
- Blood groups and transfusion 16
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 24
- Physiology top 5%
- Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology 8
-
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 7
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 7
-
- Blood disorders and treatments 5
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Adrian DanekRuth H. WalkerJens A. PetersenAnne JoutelJean-Pierre HouttevillePierre LabaugeElisabeth Tournier‐LasserveSophie Laberge
- Cited by
- NeurologyHematology
- Journals
- Nature Genetics (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (6 papers)Blood (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hans H. Jung
90 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Neurology 656
- Neurology 257
- Hematology 272
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 431
- Physiology 437
Countries citing papers authored by Hans H. Jung
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans H. Jung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans H. Jung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans H. Jung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans H. Jung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans H. Jung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans H. Jung. The network helps show where Hans H. Jung may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans H. Jung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 95 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 156 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 56 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 8 |
About Hans H. Jung
Hans H. Jung is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (24 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (16 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (9 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (8 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (7 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (7 papers), Blood disorders and treatments (5 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (656 citations), Neurology (257 citations) and Hematology (272 citations). Hans H. Jung has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Danek, Ruth H. Walker, Jens A. Petersen, Anne Joutel, Jean-Pierre Houtteville, Pierre Labauge, Elisabeth Tournier‐Lasserve, Sophie Laberge, Michaelle Cécillon and Jean‐François Bach. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Genetics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.