Eric J. Engstrom

47 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Eric J. Engstrom
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Psychology 23
  • Philosophy 190
  • Neurology 91
  • Clinical Psychology 214
  • History 74
Replace Emil Kraepelin with:
Emil Kraepelin Brazil
Jack D. Pressman United States
Werner Janzarik Germany
JAMES P. CATTELL United States
M. Bürgy Germany
Borut Škodlar Slovenia
Massimo Ballerini Italy
John Frosch United States
C. V. Haldipur United States
Michael McCabe United States
Eric J. Engstrom relative to Emil Kraepelin Brazil Emil Kraepelin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Emil Kraepelin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric J. Engstrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric J. Engstrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric J. Engstrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric J. Engstrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric J. Engstrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric J. Engstrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric J. Engstrom. The network helps show where Eric J. Engstrom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Eric J. Engstrom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric J. Engstrom Line = papers co-authored together Eric J. Engstrom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199739
2 201534
3 201630
4 201728
5 199124
6 200722
7 200217
8 200617
9 200516
10 200015
11 200714
12 202011
13 201011
14 201210
15 20169
16 20078
17 20167
18 20137
19 20126
20 20186

About Eric J. Engstrom

Eric J. Engstrom is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, History, Neurology and General Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (31 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (22 papers), Medical History and Research (17 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (15 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), Philosophy (190 citations), Neurology (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (214 citations) and History (74 citations). Eric J. Engstrom has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth S. Kendler, Matthias M. Weber, Ivan Crozier, Stephan Heckers, David J. Lederer, Volker Roelcke, Germán E. Berríos, Esa Vuorinen, Troels Pedersen and Claes Magnusson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Social History of Medicine, The American Historical Review and Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact