Hannah Long
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- David FrenchJoanna BrooksAmy BlakemoreKelly HowellsSarah PetersAnthony MaxwellYvonne Kiera BartlettAndrew Farmer
- Topics
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Hannah Long
11 papers receiving 824 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- General Health Professions 238
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 167
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Long
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Long more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Long
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Long. The network helps show where Hannah Long may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Long
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Long. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Long based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Long. Hannah Long is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesisbreakdown → | 690 |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 11 |
About Hannah Long
Hannah Long is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (23 citations), General Health Professions (238 citations) and Clinical Psychology (181 citations). Hannah Long has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include David French, Joanna Brooks, Amy Blakemore, Kelly Howells, Sarah Peters, Anthony Maxwell, Yvonne Kiera Bartlett, Andrew Farmer, Michelle Harvie and Nicola Gartland. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Quality of Life Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.