Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Eden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Eden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Eden more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Eden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Eden. The network helps show where Jill Eden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Eden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Eden.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Eden based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Eden. Jill Eden is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schulz, Richard & Jill Eden. (2016). Programs and Supports for Family Caregivers of Older Adults.6 indexed citations
2.
Schulz, Richard & Jill Eden. (2016). Recommendations to Support Family Caregivers of Older Adults.2 indexed citations
3.
Schulz, Richard & Jill Eden. (2016). Family Caregiving Roles and Impacts.33 indexed citations
4.
Schulz, Richard & Jill Eden. (2016). Economic Impact of Family Caregiving.3 indexed citations
5.
Eden, Jill, Donald M. Berwick, & Gail R. Wilensky. (2014). COMMITTEE ON THE GOVERNANCE AND FINANCING OF GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION.10 indexed citations
6.
Eden, Jill, Donald M. Berwick, & Gail R. Wilensky. (2014). Background on the Pipeline to the Physician Workforce.2 indexed citations
7.
Corrigan, Janet M., Jill Eden, & Barbara Smith. (2013). Leadership by Example: Coordinating Government Roles in Improving Health Care Quality. Medical Entomology and Zoology.13 indexed citations
8.
Eden, Jill, Katie Maslow, Mai Le, & Dan G. Blazer. (2013). The Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce for Older Adults: In Whose Hands?.233 indexed citations
9.
Eden, Jill, Katie Maslow, Mai Le, & Dan G. Blazer. (2012). The Geriatric Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce.1 indexed citations
10.
Eden, Jill, Katie Maslow, Mai Le, & Dan G. Blazer. (2012). IOM Recommendations from Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce (2008).52 indexed citations
11.
Eden, Jill, Katie Maslow, Mai Le, & Dan G. Blazer. (2012). Assessing the Service Needs of Older Adults with Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions.2 indexed citations
12.
Eden, Jill, Laura A. Levit, Alfred O. Berg, & Sally C. Morton. (2011). COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.54 indexed citations
13.
Eden, Jill, et al.. (2011). Standards for Initiating a Systematic Review.3 indexed citations
14.
Eden, Jill, Laura A. Levit, Alfred O. Berg, & Sally C. Morton. (2011). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Checklist.12 indexed citations
15.
Eden, Jill, et al.. (2011). Standards for Reporting Systematic Reviews.1 indexed citations
Eden, Jill. (1998). Measuring access to care through population-based surveys: where are we now?. PubMed. 33(3 Pt 2). 685–707; discussion 709.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.