Hannah Bows
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Sex work and related issues 6
- Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse 3
- Demography 13
- Elder Abuse and Neglect 13
- Co-authors
- Nicole Westmarland (4 shared papers)Jonathan Herring (3 shared papers)Clare McGlynn (1 shared paper)Bianca Fileborn (1 shared paper)Roisin O’Neill (2 shared papers)Kimberly Jamie (3 shared papers)Jo Lovett (1 shared paper)Sandra Walklate (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Violence Against Women (2 papers)The British Journal of Social Work (2 papers)The British Journal of Criminology (2 papers)European Journal of Criminology (1 paper)Feminist Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Hannah Bows
24 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Health 148
- Gender Studies 119
- Demography 110
- Sociology and Political Science 161
- Clinical Psychology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Bows
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Bows's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Bows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Bows more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Bows
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Bows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Bows. The network helps show where Hannah Bows may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Bows, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Hannah Bows
Hannah Bows is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Health, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elder Abuse and Neglect (13 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (148 citations), Gender Studies (119 citations), Demography (110 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations) and Clinical Psychology (74 citations). Hannah Bows has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Westmarland, Jonathan Herring, Clare McGlynn, Bianca Fileborn, Roisin O’Neill, Kimberly Jamie, Jo Lovett, Sandra Walklate, Olivia Smith and Miranda A. H. Horvath. Their work appears in journals such as Violence Against Women, The British Journal of Social Work, The British Journal of Criminology, European Journal of Criminology and Feminist Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.