H. J. Noltie

617 citations
37 papers · 120 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers)Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers)Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers)

In The Last Decade

H. J. Noltie

30 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers

H. J. Noltie
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 73
  • Plant Science 68
  • Molecular Biology 47
  • Genetics 10
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 9
Replace Teonildes Sacramento Nunes with:
Teonildes Sacramento Nunes Brazil
Heather Glen South Africa
Chi Toan Le Vietnam
Rachel Schwallier Netherlands
Nasim Azani Iran
Carole Sinou Canada
Cristiana Koschnitzke Brazil
Joseph Pitton de Tournefort
Sarah Maria Athiê‐Souza Brazil
Vanessa Holanda Righetti de Abreu Brazil
H. J. Noltie relative to Teonildes Sacramento Nunes Brazil Teonildes Sacramento Nunes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Teonildes Sacramento Nunes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. J. Noltie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. J. Noltie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. J. Noltie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. J. Noltie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. J. Noltie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. J. Noltie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. J. Noltie. The network helps show where H. J. Noltie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. J. Noltie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. J. Noltie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. J. Noltie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. J. Noltie. H. J. Noltie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 5
6 1
7 11
8 2
9 3
10 11
11 0
12 3
13 0
14
1761) Proposal to conserve the name Hewittia against Shutereia Choisy (Convolvulaceae)
1
15 2
16 5
17
Arenga micrantha: a little-known eastern Himalayan palm.
2
18
New irises from Yunnan
1
19 5
20 7

About H. J. Noltie

H. J. Noltie is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Museology and Forestry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (73 citations), Plant Science (68 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (9 citations). H. J. Noltie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Ingram, Richard Ingram, D. J. Mabberley, Ray Desmond, Mark Watson, Richard J. Abbott, Pedro Jiménez‐Mejías, Janita Gurung, Mehdi Zarrei and Paul Wilkin. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Journal of Ecology and Taxon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026