Richard Ingram

1.3k total citations
44 papers, 997 citations indexed

About

Richard Ingram is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Ingram has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 997 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Richard Ingram's work include Social Work Education and Practice (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (8 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers). Richard Ingram is often cited by papers focused on Social Work Education and Practice (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (8 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers). Richard Ingram collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Richard Ingram's co-authors include Constanze Bonifer, Maarten Hoogenkamp, Deborah Clarke, Monika Lichtinger, Hiromi Tagoh, Divya Jindal‐Snape, Daniel G. Tenen, Yongbiao Xue, Zsuzsanna Schwarz‐Sommer and Brendan Davies and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The EMBO Journal.

In The Last Decade

Richard Ingram

42 papers receiving 959 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Ingram United Kingdom 16 514 218 161 142 128 44 997
Bryan Boyle Ireland 15 636 1.2× 142 0.7× 52 0.3× 20 0.1× 44 0.3× 41 1.6k
Dorothy A. Miller United States 22 741 1.4× 52 0.2× 527 3.3× 18 0.1× 53 0.4× 57 1.5k
David Telford United States 14 427 0.8× 241 1.1× 21 0.1× 6 0.0× 57 0.4× 18 934
Dana Lee Baker United States 17 249 0.5× 96 0.4× 9 0.1× 23 0.2× 55 0.4× 48 963
Jennifer Wallace United Kingdom 18 95 0.2× 139 0.6× 26 0.2× 20 0.1× 54 0.4× 66 974
Miguel Gallardo Spain 17 397 0.8× 73 0.3× 9 0.1× 6 0.0× 34 0.3× 54 745
Susan Alexander United States 15 601 1.2× 73 0.3× 15 0.1× 6 0.0× 9 0.1× 36 1.3k
Pat Cox United Kingdom 11 111 0.2× 69 0.3× 11 0.1× 85 0.6× 120 0.9× 43 640
Matthew Thomas United States 13 281 0.5× 365 1.7× 79 0.5× 54 0.4× 28 940
Kathleen Green United States 10 167 0.3× 14 0.1× 11 0.1× 12 0.1× 70 0.5× 29 625

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Ingram. The network helps show where Richard Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Ingram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Ingram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Ingram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Ingram. Richard Ingram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ingram, Richard, et al.. (2024). Going beyond creativity: Primary headteachers as social intrapreneurs?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 53(6). 1394–1416. 2 indexed citations
2.
Ingram, Richard. (2024). Using leverage points to reconsider the sociopolitical drivers of exclusion from education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 56(11). 1077–1087.
3.
Ingram, Richard, et al.. (2022). Conceptualising Creativity and Innovation in the Role of Primary Sector Headteachers. Education Sciences. 12(2). 70–70. 5 indexed citations
4.
Dincă, Violeta Mihaela, et al.. (2019). Challenges Regarding the Internationalisation of Universities from Scotland, within the Brexit Landscape. Amfiteatru Economic. 21(50). 194–194. 2 indexed citations
5.
Cree, Viviene E., Fiona Morrison, Gary Clapton, S. Levy, & Richard Ingram. (2018). Selecting social work students: lessons from research in Scotland. Social Work Education. 37(4). 490–506. 5 indexed citations
6.
Ingram, Richard. (2015). UNDERSTANDING EMOTIONS IN SOCIAL WORK: THEORY, PRACTICE AND REFLECTION. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 9 indexed citations
7.
Lichtinger, Monika, Nadine Obier, Richard Ingram, et al.. (2013). The hematopoietic master regulator RUNX1 reshapes the epigenetic landscape at the onset of hematopoiesis. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 6(S1). 5 indexed citations
8.
Ingram, Richard. (2012). Locating Emotional Intelligence at the Heart of Social Work Practice. The British Journal of Social Work. 43(5). 987–1004. 46 indexed citations
9.
Ingram, Richard. (2012). Emotions, social work practice and supervision: an uneasy alliance?. Journal of Social Work Practice. 27(1). 5–19. 66 indexed citations
10.
Ingram, Richard, Arthur D. Riggs, & Constanze Bonifer. (2010). PAP-LMPCR: An Improved, Sequence-Selective Method for the In Vivo Analysis of Transcription Factor Occupancy and Chromatin Fine Structure. Methods in molecular biology. 687. 177–192. 1 indexed citations
11.
Lichtinger, Monika, et al.. (2010). Chromatin regulation by RUNX1. Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases. 44(4). 287–290. 20 indexed citations
12.
Ingram, Richard, Jeanne M. LeBon, Steve S. Sommer, et al.. (2008). PAP-LMPCR for improved, allele-specific footprinting and automated chromatin fine structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 36(3). e19–e19. 3 indexed citations
13.
Lichtinger, Monika, Richard Ingram, Mathias W. Hornef, Constanze Bonifer, & Michael Rehli. (2007). Transcription Factor PU.1 Controls Transcription Start Site Positioning and Alternative TLR4 Promoter Usage. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 282(37). 26874–26883. 33 indexed citations
14.
Tagoh, Hiromi, Richard Ingram, Nicola K. Wilson, et al.. (2006). The mechanism of repression of the myeloid‐specific c‐fms gene by Pax5 during B lineage restriction. The EMBO Journal. 25(5). 1070–1080. 49 indexed citations
15.
Lefèvre, Pascal, Hiromi Tagoh, Maarten Hoogenkamp, et al.. (2005). Differentiation-dependent Alterations in Histone Methylation and Chromatin Architecture at the Inducible Chicken Lysozyme Gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(30). 27552–27560. 34 indexed citations
16.
Ingram, Richard. (2005). Rapid, solid-phase based automated analysis of chromatin structure and transcription factor occupancy in living eukaryotic cells. Nucleic Acids Research. 33(1). e1–e1. 10 indexed citations
17.
Causier, Barry, Rosa Castillo, Richard Ingram, et al.. (2005). Evolution in Action: Following Function in Duplicated Floral Homeotic Genes. Current Biology. 15(16). 1508–1512. 132 indexed citations
18.
Ackermann‐Liebrich, Ursula, H Ross Anderson, Josep M. Antó, et al.. (1999). Asthma mortality:summary of a round-table discussion, New York, January 1997. European Respiratory Journal. 13(1). 221–221. 4 indexed citations
19.
Ingram, Richard. (1998). Power analysis and sample size estimation. Journal of Research in Nursing. 3(2). 132–139. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ingram, Richard, et al.. (1983). Discovery of Senecio cambrensis Rosser in Edinburgh.. New Journal of Botany. 14(4). 407–408. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026