Ruth Ingram
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant Science top 10%
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Papers in
-
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 9
- Botanical Research and Chemistry 3
- Plant and animal studies 2
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 2
-
- Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties 8
- Co-authors
- Stephen A. Harris (4 shared papers)Richard J. Abbott (4 shared papers)H. J. Noltie (3 shared papers)Colin E. Hughes (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Thomson (1 shared paper)D. L. Jennings (1 shared paper)Pauline B. Topham (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (5 papers)Heredity (5 papers)Journal of Ecology (1 paper)Plant Systematics and Evolution (1 paper)Taxon (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth Ingram
17 papers receiving 467 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 352
- Plant Science 279
- Genetics 130
- Molecular Biology 255
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 39
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Ingram. The network helps show where Ruth Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 259 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 17 | On the identity of the Irish populations of Sisyrhinchium | 1967 | 3 |
About Ruth Ingram
Ruth Ingram is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Aquatic Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (9 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (8 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (352 citations), Plant Science (279 citations), Genetics (130 citations), Molecular Biology (255 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (39 citations). Ruth Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Harris, Richard J. Abbott, H. J. Noltie, Colin E. Hughes, Andrew M. Thomson, D. L. Jennings and Pauline B. Topham. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Heredity, Journal of Ecology, Plant Systematics and Evolution and Taxon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.