George W. Staples

803 citations
73 papers · 577 indexed · h-index 13

George W. Staples

69 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

George W. Staples
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 447
  • Plant Science 270
  • Molecular Biology 276
  • Forestry 15
  • Food Science 65
Replace W.L.A. Hetterscheid with:
W.L.A. Hetterscheid Netherlands
Tanja M. Schuster Germany
Pavel Hanáčêk Czechia
Ali Asghar Maassoumi Iran
Leslie R. Landrum United States
María Silvia Ferrucci Argentina
Focko Weberling Germany
Xavier Aubriot France
A. J. G. H. Kostermans Indonesia
Angela Borges Martins Brazil
George W. Staples relative to W.L.A. Hetterscheid Netherlands W.L.A. Hetterscheid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
W.L.A. Hetterscheid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George W. Staples

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Staples's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Staples with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Staples more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Staples

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Staples. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Staples. The network helps show where George W. Staples may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George W. Staples, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George W. Staples Line = papers co-authored together George W. Staples links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20218
3 20211
4 20186
5 201722
6 201721
7 20177
8 201621
9 20151
10 20144
11
Distribution, conservation status and threats to Erycibe species (Convolvulaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia.
20132
12
1761) Proposal to conserve the name Hewittia against Shutereia Choisy (Convolvulaceae)
20071
13
A synopsis of Lepistemon (Convolvulaceae) in Australasia
20074
14 20056
15 200436
16 19998
17 199912
18 19961
19
The genus Porana (Convolvulaceae) in Australia
19872
20 19817

About George W. Staples

George W. Staples is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Forestry, having authored 73 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (51 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (40 papers), Plant and animal studies (20 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (15 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (10 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (447 citations), Plant Science (270 citations) and Molecular Biology (276 citations). George W. Staples has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paweena Traiperm, Daniel F. Austin, Derral R. Herbst, Ana Rita G. Simões, Richard A. Howard, Rosângela Simão‐Bianchini, Maria Teresa Buril, Charles E. Jarvis, Jefferson Prado and J. Andrew McDonald. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Taxon and Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026