H. E. Stanton

514 citations
64 papers · 395 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pain Management and Placebo Effect 19
    • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function 6
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 9
    • Psychological Treatments and Assessments 5

H. E. Stanton

59 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

H. E. Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Music 41
  • General Psychology 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 181
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Clinical Psychology 112
Replace Jon Frederickson with:
Jon Frederickson United States
Rhoda L. Fisher United States
Douglas H. Powell United States
Marshall F. Gilula United States
Vija B. Lusebrink United States
Wallace E. Dixon United States
Katarina Habe Slovenia
Paula Thomson United States
Henk Smeijsters Netherlands
Paul G. Salmon United States
H. E. Stanton relative to Jon Frederickson United States Jon Frederickson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jon Frederickson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Stanton. The network helps show where H. E. Stanton may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Hypnotic relaxation and the reduction of sleep onset insomnia.
198934
2 197629
3 199425
4 197819
5
Self-hypnosis: One path to reduced test anxiety.
199417
6 197516
7 197616
8 199314
9 198914
10 197512
11 197312
12 197711
13 197810
14 197410
15 197910
16 19789
17 19899
18 19819
19 19749
20 19828

About H. E. Stanton

H. E. Stanton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (19 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (9 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Music Therapy and Health (5 papers) and Psychological Treatments and Assessments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (41 citations), General Psychology (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations) and Clinical Psychology (112 citations). H. E. Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Zambia. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Australian Psychologist, Australian Journal of Education, Contemporary Educational Psychology and International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact