Graham Webster
- Archeology top 2%
- Anthropology top 5%
- History top 5%
- Paleontology top 10%
- Space and Planetary Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- James DewarRonald MellorStephen JohnsonStanley M. BursteinMichael MaasE. A. ThompsonMartin BiddleS. S. Frere
- Topics
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (13 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Graham Webster
30 papers receiving 181 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Archeology 147
- Anthropology 97
- History 52
- Paleontology 51
- Space and Planetary Science 42
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Webster
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Webster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Webster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Webster. The network helps show where Graham Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Webster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Webster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Webster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Webster. Graham Webster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mapping U.S.–China Technology Decoupling | 1 |
| 2 | AI Policy and China: Realities of State-Led Development | 2 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Boudica, the British revolt against Rome AD 60 | 12 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Practical archaeology: An introduction to archaeological field-work and excavation | 1 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | The rebellion of Boudicca | 7 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | The lead mining industry in north Wales in Roman times | 4 |
About Graham Webster
Graham Webster is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (13 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (42 citations), Archeology (147 citations) and Archeology (12 citations). Graham Webster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Dewar, Ronald Mellor, Stephen Johnson, Stanley M. Burstein, Michael Maas, E. A. Thompson, Martin Biddle, S. S. Frere, G. C. Dunning and Cassandra L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Antiquity and The Classical World.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.