Graham Seal
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- History top 10%
- Anthropology
- Topics
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (6 papers)Australian History and Society (4 papers)Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Graham Seal
19 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Political Science and International Relations 63
- Social Psychology 29
- History 21
- Anthropology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Seal
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Seal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Seal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Seal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Seal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Seal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Seal. The network helps show where Graham Seal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Seal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Seal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Seal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Seal. Graham Seal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Savage Shore: Extraordinary Stories of Survival and Tragedy from the Early Voyages of Discovery | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | The Soldiers' Press: Trench Journals in First World War | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Century of Silent Service | 1 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Dog's Eye and Dead Horse: The Complete Guide to Australian Rhyming Slang | 1 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Inventing Anzac: The Digger And National Mythology | 40 |
| 15 | Verandah music : roots of Australian tradition | 1 |
| 16 | Tell 'Em I Died Game : The Legend of Ned Kelly | 8 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | The Outlaw Legend: A Cultural Tradition in Britain, America and Australia | 29 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Graham Seal
Graham Seal is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Literature and Literary Theory and Linguistics and Language, having authored 26 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (6 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (63 citations), Music (8 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Graham Seal has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Doyle, Rob Willis, Rosemary Marangoly George and Stephen Cowden. Their work appears in journals such as Labour History, Journal of Australian Studies and Folklore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.