Eric Naiman
-
- Soviet and Russian History 4
- European history and politics 3
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies 7
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms 5
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 4
- Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies 3
- History top 5%
-
- European Linguistics and Anthropology 5
-
- Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies 5
- Journals
- The Slavic and East European Journal (5 papers)The Russian Review (3 papers)Russian Literature (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUkraine
In The Last Decade
Eric Naiman
16 papers receiving 117 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Political Science and International Relations 130
- Cultural Studies 34
- Space and Planetary Science 5
- Sociology and Political Science 145
- History 33
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Naiman
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Naiman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Naiman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Naiman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Naiman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Naiman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Naiman. The network helps show where Eric Naiman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Eric Naiman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 4 | Everyday life in early Soviet Russia : taking the Revolution inside | 2006 | 21 |
| 5 | The Landscape of Stalinism: The Art and Ideology of Soviet Space | 2003 | 69 |
| 6 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 56 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 0 |
About Eric Naiman
Eric Naiman is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies (7 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (5 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (5 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (5 papers), Soviet and Russian History (4 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (4 papers), Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (3 papers) and European history and politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (130 citations), Cultural Studies (34 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (5 citations). Eric Naiman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Evgeny Dobrenko, Sheila Fitzpatrick, Mary A. Nicholas and Robert W. Chandler. Their work appears in journals such as The Slavic and East European Journal, The Russian Review, Russian Literature, The American Historical Review and Comparative Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.