714 total citations 7 papers, 221 citations indexed
About
Samuel Shirley is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Sociology and Political Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, Samuel Shirley has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 221 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Samuel Shirley's work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (1 paper). Samuel Shirley is often cited by papers focused on Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (1 paper). Samuel Shirley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Samuel Shirley's co-authors include Benedictus de Spinoza, Seymour Feldman, Michael L. Morgan, Edwin Curley, Jonathan Bennett, Baruch Spinoza and Gregory H. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Medical Entomology and Zoology and E.J. Brill eBooks.
Citations per year, relative to Samuel Shirley Samuel Shirley (= 1×)
peers
Seymour Feldman
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Shirley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Shirley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Shirley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Shirley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Shirley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Shirley. The network helps show where Samuel Shirley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel Shirley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel Shirley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel Shirley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel Shirley. Samuel Shirley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Spinoza, Benedictus de, Michael L. Morgan, & Samuel Shirley. (2006). The Essential Spinoza: Ethics And Related Writings. Medical Entomology and Zoology.30 indexed citations
2.
Spinoza, Benedictus de, Samuel Shirley, & Michael L. Morgan. (2002). Complete Works Complete Works.8 indexed citations
3.
Spinoza, Benedictus de, Samuel Shirley, & Seymour Feldman. (1992). The Ethics ; Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect ; Selected Letters.29 indexed citations
4.
Spinoza, Benedictus de & Samuel Shirley. (1989). Tractatus theologico-politicus : (Gebhardt edition, 1925). E.J. Brill eBooks.8 indexed citations
5.
Bennett, Jonathan, Edwin Curley, Baruch Spinoza, Samuel Shirley, & Seymour Feldman. (1987). The Collected Works of Spinoza.. The Philosophical Review. 96(2). 306–306.61 indexed citations
6.
Spinoza, Benedictus de, Seymour Feldman, & Samuel Shirley. (1982). The ethics and selected letters. Medical Entomology and Zoology.84 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.