Deborah Steiner
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 2%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 30
- Classical Antiquity Studies 30
- Historical and Literary Studies 5
- Archeology 21
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 18
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 5
- Ancient Near East History 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas K. Hubbard (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Bott Spillius (1 shared paper)Jane Milton (1 shared paper)Richard Hamilton (1 shared paper)Homer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Hellenic Studies (4 papers)Classical Antiquity (3 papers)The American Journal of Philology (3 papers)Classical Philology (3 papers)The Classical World (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Deborah Steiner
36 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Anthropology 198
- Archeology 111
- General Psychology 10
- Classics 23
- Philosophy 58
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Steiner
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Steiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Steiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Steiner. The network helps show where Deborah Steiner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 5 |
About Deborah Steiner
Deborah Steiner is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (30 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (18 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (5 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Ancient Near East History (4 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (198 citations), Archeology (111 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Classics (23 citations) and Philosophy (58 citations). Deborah Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas K. Hubbard, Elizabeth Bott Spillius, Jane Milton, Richard Hamilton and Homer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Classical Antiquity, The American Journal of Philology, Classical Philology and The Classical World.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.