Graham Low

3.4k total citations
77 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Graham Low is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Low has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 35 papers in Information Systems and 25 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Graham Low's work include Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (25 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (17 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (15 papers). Graham Low is often cited by papers focused on Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (25 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (17 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (15 papers). Graham Low collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Spain and United Kingdom. Graham Low's co-authors include D. Ross Jeffery, Ghassan Beydoun, Michael Lawrence, Brian Henderson‐Sellers, Amir Hossein Ghapanchi, Farhad Daneshgar, César González-Pérez, Lynne Cameron, Seana Coulson and Josef Stern and has published in prestigious journals such as MIS Quarterly, Expert Systems with Applications and Information Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Graham Low

71 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Graham Low Australia 18 718 385 354 331 261 77 1.8k
Kate Ehrlich United States 27 1.3k 1.8× 828 2.2× 293 0.8× 87 0.3× 299 1.1× 70 3.1k
Robert D. Macredie United Kingdom 28 720 1.0× 381 1.0× 170 0.5× 241 0.7× 96 0.4× 88 2.3k
Peter Reimann Australia 24 337 0.5× 763 2.0× 682 1.9× 144 0.4× 32 0.1× 131 3.6k
Thomas Erickson United States 27 575 0.8× 543 1.4× 168 0.5× 166 0.5× 28 0.1× 92 3.4k
Louis M. Gomez United States 21 834 1.2× 937 2.4× 166 0.5× 59 0.2× 63 0.2× 36 2.2k
Fernando Flores United States 5 359 0.5× 559 1.5× 130 0.4× 385 1.2× 23 0.1× 6 2.3k
Yannis Dimitriadis Spain 33 940 1.3× 662 1.7× 67 0.2× 77 0.2× 62 0.2× 222 3.9k
Jane Siegel United States 13 278 0.4× 365 0.9× 82 0.2× 123 0.4× 29 0.1× 29 2.6k
Fernando Flores Argentina 5 286 0.4× 448 1.2× 98 0.3× 211 0.6× 21 0.1× 14 1.7k
Aaron Marcus United States 21 361 0.5× 224 0.6× 161 0.5× 78 0.2× 47 0.2× 148 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Low

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Low's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Low with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Low more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Low

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Low. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Low. The network helps show where Graham Low may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Low

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Low. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Low based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Low. Graham Low is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Land, Lesley Pek Wee, et al.. (2019). Start-up tasks for software development projects from customer and vendor perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
2.
Shen, Jun, et al.. (2011). Towards peer selection in a semantically-enriched service execution framework with QoS specifications. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 201–206. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wohlin, Claes, Aybüke Aurum, Lefteris Angelis, et al.. (2011). The Success Factors Powering Industry-Academia Collaboration. IEEE Software. 29(2). 67–73. 100 indexed citations
4.
Gibbs, Raymond W., John A. Barnden, George Lakoff, et al.. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 462 indexed citations
5.
Low, Graham, et al.. (2007). Information Systems Outsourcing Relationship Model. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 14(2). 18 indexed citations
6.
Low, Graham, et al.. (2007). MOBMAS: A methodology for ontology-based multi-agent systems development. Information and Software Technology. 50(7-8). 697–722. 52 indexed citations
7.
Low, Graham, et al.. (2006). A Methodological Framework for Ontology Centric Agent Oriented Software Engineering. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 21(2). 117–132. 18 indexed citations
8.
Bresciani, Paolo, et al.. (2005). Agent-oriented information systems II : 6th International Bi-Conference Workshop, AOIS 2004, Riga, Latvia, June 8, 2004 and New York, NY, USA, July 20, 2004 : revised selected papers. Springer eBooks.
9.
Beydoun, Ghassan, César González-Pérez, Graham Low, & Brian Henderson‐Sellers. (2005). Towards method engineering for multi-agent systems: A preliminary validation of a generic MAS metamodel. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 51–56. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bresciani, Paolo, Paolo Giorgini, Brian Henderson‐Sellers, Graham Low, & Michael Winikoff. (2005). Agent-Oriented Information Systems II: 6th International Bi-Conference Workshop, AOIS 2004, Riga, Latvia, June 8, 2004 and New York, NY, USA, July 20, ... / Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). 1 indexed citations
11.
Jeffery, D. Ross & Graham Low. (1997). Function Points and their Use.. Australian Computer Journal. 29. 148–156. 7 indexed citations
12.
Henderson‐Sellers, Brian, et al.. (1996). An Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Notation for Distributed Systems.. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 9. 7 indexed citations
13.
Henderson‐Sellers, Brian, et al.. (1996). Extending the MOSES Methodology to Distributed Systems.. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 9. 3 indexed citations
14.
Low, Graham, et al.. (1996). Incorporation of Distributed Computing Concerns Into Object-Oriented Methodologies.. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 9. 12–20. 4 indexed citations
15.
Case, Tom, Brian Henderson‐Sellers, & Graham Low. (1995). Extending the MOSES Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Methodology to Include Database Applications.. Journal of Object-oriented Programming. 8.
16.
Low, Graham, et al.. (1994). Software Reusability in Australia.. Australian Computer Journal. 26. 134–142. 3 indexed citations
17.
Jeffery, D. Ross, Graham Low, & Michelle Barnes. (1993). A comparison of function point counting techniques. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 19(5). 529–532. 65 indexed citations
18.
Reeken, A.J. van, et al.. (1993). An empirical evaluation of the use of CASE tools. 81–87. 9 indexed citations
19.
Lawrence, Michael & Graham Low. (1993). Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development. MIS Quarterly. 17(2). 195–208. 145 indexed citations
20.
Low, Graham & D. Ross Jeffery. (1990). Function points in the estimation and evaluation of the software process. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 16(1). 64–71. 155 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026