Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Group processes in computer-mediated communication
1986905 citationsJane Siegel, Vitaly Dubrovsky et al.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Siegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Siegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Siegel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Siegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Siegel. The network helps show where Jane Siegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Siegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Siegel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Siegel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Siegel. Jane Siegel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Siegel, Jane, et al.. (2001). IETM Usability: Using Empirical Studies to Improve Performance Aiding. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
8.
Fussell, Susan R., Robert E. Kraut, & Jane Siegel. (2000). Coordination of communication. 21–30.260 indexed citations
Streitz, Norbert, et al.. (1998). Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture.10 indexed citations
12.
Siegel, Jane, Robert E. Kraut, Mark Miller, David Kaplan, & Malcolm Bauer. (1996). Collaborative Wearable Systems Research and Evaluation (Video Program).. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 9–10.1 indexed citations
Herbsleb, James D., et al.. (1994). Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).113 indexed citations
15.
Siegel, Jane, et al.. (1990). National Software Capacity: Near-Term Study.4 indexed citations
16.
Kiesler, Sara, et al.. (1988). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication (Reprint). 657–682.9 indexed citations
17.
Siegel, Jane, Vitaly Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, & Timothy W. McGuire. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37(2). 157–187.905 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.