Josef Stern
About
In The Last Decade
Josef Stern
6 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 387
- Language and Linguistics 163
- Social Psychology 113
- Philosophy 112
- Literature and Literary Theory 90
Countries citing papers authored by Josef Stern
This map shows the geographic impact of Josef Stern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josef Stern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josef Stern more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josef Stern
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josef Stern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josef Stern. The network helps show where Josef Stern may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josef Stern
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josef Stern. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josef Stern based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josef Stern. Josef Stern is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 462 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 12 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.