Graham Button

5.1k citations
57 papers · 2.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Button

53 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Graham Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Human-Computer Interaction 658
  • Language and Linguistics 848
  • Literature and Literary Theory 451
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 426
  • Computer Science Applications 136
Replace Wes Sharrock with:
Wes Sharrock United Kingdom
Rupert Wegerif United Kingdom
Charlotte Linde United States
Agnes Kukulska‐Hulme United Kingdom
Chun Lai Hong Kong
Kathryn Henderson United States
Rand J. Spiro United States
Brigid Barron United States
Marilyn Ford Australia
Yong Zhao United States
Graham Button relative to Wes Sharrock United Kingdom Wes Sharrock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Wes Sharrock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Button. The network helps show where Graham Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graham Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Button Line = papers co-authored together Graham Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988318
2 1991288
3
Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology
1992258
4 1998171
5 1985155
6 1996146
7 2000116
8 198196
9 200992
10 199689
11 198784
12
Computers, Minds and Conduct
199576
13 199568
14
Occasioned practices in the work of software engineers
199467
15 199865
16 200147
17 199340
18 198835
19 199533
20 200830

About Graham Button

Graham Button is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Social Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (11 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Digital Communication and Language (5 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (658 citations), Language and Linguistics (848 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (451 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (426 citations) and Computer Science Applications (136 citations). Graham Button has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wes Sharrock, Paul Dourish, Neil Casey, Richard Harper, Peter Tolmie, Tom Rodden, Jeff Coulter, John Lee, David Mason and Sally Coates. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Human Studies, Design Studies, Work Employment and Society and Social Studies of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact