Grace McKee

729 total citations
30 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

Grace McKee is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Grace McKee has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 8 papers in Oncology and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Grace McKee's work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers). Grace McKee is often cited by papers focused on Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers). Grace McKee collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Grace McKee's co-authors include M.W. Kissin, Ivan Robinson, Peter A. Jackson, James A. d’Arcy, A.G. Nicholson, Yukio Koibuchi, Tetsunari Oyama, P. Wilson, M J Coppen and Steven Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, British journal of surgery and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Grace McKee

28 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Grace McKee United Kingdom 12 189 178 123 122 98 30 477
M.H. Galea United Kingdom 11 216 1.1× 218 1.2× 166 1.3× 66 0.5× 112 1.1× 22 443
H.D. Zakhour United Kingdom 10 134 0.7× 102 0.6× 58 0.5× 39 0.3× 90 0.9× 22 336
Yaman Tarabishy United States 11 199 1.1× 182 1.0× 151 1.2× 39 0.3× 125 1.3× 12 451
Christine N. Booth United States 13 95 0.5× 99 0.6× 138 1.1× 181 1.5× 107 1.1× 66 536
Prashant Jani Canada 12 209 1.1× 259 1.5× 147 1.2× 63 0.5× 110 1.1× 23 498
J.S. Walsh United Kingdom 7 210 1.1× 210 1.2× 135 1.1× 19 0.2× 58 0.6× 8 398
María Jesús Quintana Spain 10 120 0.6× 113 0.6× 205 1.7× 39 0.3× 63 0.6× 11 424
MJ Michell United Kingdom 13 322 1.7× 247 1.4× 207 1.7× 34 0.3× 98 1.0× 39 658
Raimond Giard Netherlands 11 84 0.4× 44 0.2× 104 0.8× 67 0.5× 170 1.7× 48 414
Erin Cordeiro Canada 15 90 0.5× 215 1.2× 229 1.9× 73 0.6× 187 1.9× 34 497

Countries citing papers authored by Grace McKee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace McKee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace McKee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace McKee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace McKee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace McKee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace McKee. The network helps show where Grace McKee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grace McKee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grace McKee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grace McKee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grace McKee. Grace McKee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Herst, Patries M., Kevin Dunne, Kathleen N. Moore, et al.. (2025). Mepitel Film Versus StrataXRT in Managing Radiation Dermatitis in an Intra‐Patient Controlled Clinical Trial of 80 Postmastectomy Patients. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 69(4). 440–446. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gawron, Andrew J., et al.. (2024). Validation of a National Pathology Database for Colonoscopy Quality Reporting and Assurance. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 23(5). 866–868.e1. 1 indexed citations
3.
McKee, Grace, Lex Rutten, Preben Larsen, & Aidan Leong. (2023). PO-1220 Feasibility and compliance of StrataXRT in treatment of radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 182. S976–S977. 1 indexed citations
4.
Michelow, Pam, et al.. (2006). Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method in a high‐risk population. Cytopathology. 17(3). 110–115. 10 indexed citations
5.
Oyama, Tetsunari, Yukio Koibuchi, & Grace McKee. (2004). Core needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic method for breast lesions: Comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA). Breast Cancer. 11(4). 339–342. 39 indexed citations
6.
Jacobs, Timothy W., Yvan C. Bédard, Charles V. Biscotti, et al.. (2004). Interobserver agreement of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine‐needle aspirations on ThinPrep®. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 30(6). 389–395. 23 indexed citations
7.
Georgian-Smith, Dianne, Grace McKee, Eren D. Yeh, et al.. (2004). The Mammary Hamartoma. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 23(10). 1267–1273. 25 indexed citations
8.
McKee, Grace. (2004). Atlas of Gynecologic Cytology. 1 indexed citations
9.
McKee, Grace, et al.. (2003). Epithelioid variant of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Diagnosis by fine‐needle aspiration. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 29(2). 55–60. 24 indexed citations
10.
McKee, Grace, et al.. (2000). Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 53(3). 191–196. 44 indexed citations
11.
Ciatto, Stefano, Maria Paola Cariaggi, Aurelia Minuti, et al.. (1996). Interlaboratory Reproducibility In Reporting Inadequate Cervical Smears—A Multicentre Multinational Study. Cytopathology. 7(6). 386–390. 16 indexed citations
12.
O'Sullivan, J P, S M Ismail, W. S. Barnes, et al.. (1996). Inter‐ and intra‐observer variation in the reporting of cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists versus histopathologists. Cytopathology. 7(2). 78–89. 18 indexed citations
13.
Robinson, Ivan & Grace McKee. (1996). Cytological performance in palpable versus stereotactically sampled breast lesions. The Breast. 5(6). 415–417.
14.
Robinson, Ivan, Grace McKee, & M.W. Kissin. (1995). Typing and grading breast carcinoma on fine‐needle aspiration: Is this clinically useful information?. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 13(3). 260–265. 15 indexed citations
15.
Robinson, Ivan, Grace McKee, Peter A. Jackson, Martin Cook, & M.W. Kissin. (1995). Lobular carcinoma of the breast: Cytological features supporting the diagnosis of lobular cancer. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 13(3). 196–201. 16 indexed citations
16.
Asimakopoulos, George, T M Loosemore, R C Bowyer, Grace McKee, & A E B Giddings. (1995). A regional study of thyroidectomy: surgical pathology suggests scope to improve quality and reduce cost.. PubMed. 77(6). 425–30. 7 indexed citations
17.
Robinson, Ivan, Grace McKee, A.G. Nicholson, et al.. (1994). Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. The Lancet. 343(8903). 947–949. 145 indexed citations
18.
O'Sullivan, J P, S M Ismail, W. S. Barnes, et al.. (1994). Interobserver variation in the diagnosis and grading of dyskaryosis in cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists compared with non-specialists.. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 47(6). 515–518. 26 indexed citations
19.
McKee, Grace. (1990). Cytopathology of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 43(2). 175.1–175. 9 indexed citations
20.
Sutton, Chris, et al.. (1988). DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF OCTADECA-9,11-DIENOIC ACID IN CERVICAL NEOPLASIA. The Lancet. 332(8606). 309–311. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026