Diana Simpson
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
- Surgery 11
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 9
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 1
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Sandra L. Wong (11 shared papers)Kelly M. McMasters (9 shared papers)Celia Chao (4 shared papers)David J. Carlson (6 shared papers)R. Dirk Noyes (6 shared papers)Todd M. Tuttle (6 shared papers)Peter S. Turk (5 shared papers)Alison L. Laidley (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Surgery (4 papers)The Breast Journal (3 papers)Annals of Surgery (2 papers)The American Surgeon (1 paper)MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Diana Simpson
13 papers receiving 791 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cancer Research 651
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 590
- Surgery 471
- Dermatology 63
- Oncology 180
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Simpson
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Simpson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Simpson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Simpson. The network helps show where Diana Simpson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Diana Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 170 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 2 |
About Diana Simpson
Diana Simpson is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Small Animals, having authored 14 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (9 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (651 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (590 citations), Surgery (471 citations), Dermatology (63 citations) and Oncology (180 citations). Diana Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Sandra L. Wong, Kelly M. McMasters, Celia Chao, David J. Carlson, R. Dirk Noyes, Todd M. Tuttle, Peter S. Turk, Alison L. Laidley, Terre Q. McGlothin and Chelsea Brown. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, The Breast Journal, Annals of Surgery, The American Surgeon and MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.