This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cytopathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cytopathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytopathology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cytopathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cytopathology.
About Cytopathology
The 2.0k papers published in Cytopathology in the last decades have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Cytopathology usually cover Oncology (573 papers), Epidemiology (644 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (328 papers), Dermatology (159 papers) and Surgery (647 papers) specifically the topics of Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (458 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (239 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (171 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (151 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (144 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (138 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (107 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cytopathology are Svante R. Orell, Pranab Dey, Amanda Herbert, Deepali Jain, N. Dudding, JA Smith, Paul Shield, Gabrijela Kocjan, Kusum Verma and Sandeep Mathur.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.