Diagnostic Cytopathology

6.1k papers and 75.1k indexed citations

About

The 6.1k papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology in the last decades have received a total of 75.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology usually cover Surgery (2.3k papers), Oncology (1.7k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (813 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (669 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (492 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnostic Cytopathology are Lester J. Layfield, Zubair Baloch, Dilip K. Das, Prabodh K. Gupta, Pranab Dey, Syed Z. Ali, Suzanne M. Selvaggi, Jan F. Silverman, Claire W. Michael and Nour Sneige.

In The Last Decade

Diagnostic Cytopathology

5.8k papers receiving 71.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Diagnostic Cytopathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnostic Cytopathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnostic Cytopathology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnostic Cytopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026