A. Deery

1.0k total citations
25 papers, 754 citations indexed

About

A. Deery is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Deery has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 754 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in A. Deery's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers). A. Deery is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers). A. Deery collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. A. Deery's co-authors include Tomasz R. Kurzawinski, Brian R Davidson, Robert Dick, James Dooley, Jesse C. Crow, J. Giles, K E F Hobbs, Kenneth E.F. Hobbs, Patrick Walker and Albert Singer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Hepatology and Gut.

In The Last Decade

A. Deery

25 papers receiving 716 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Deery United Kingdom 15 434 276 270 270 74 25 754
Mark Suhrland United States 16 282 0.6× 199 0.7× 128 0.5× 211 0.8× 27 0.4× 47 726
Janet F. Stastny United States 12 201 0.5× 217 0.8× 128 0.5× 153 0.6× 44 0.6× 23 585
James Nevin United Kingdom 16 461 1.1× 167 0.6× 195 0.7× 268 1.0× 129 1.7× 42 774
P. Wilson United Kingdom 17 170 0.4× 211 0.8× 110 0.4× 205 0.8× 46 0.6× 29 707
E. J. Wilkinson United States 15 374 0.9× 323 1.2× 141 0.5× 126 0.5× 197 2.7× 36 950
Dinesh Pradhan United States 15 243 0.6× 191 0.7× 148 0.5× 178 0.7× 100 1.4× 57 676
Johanna M. M. Grefte Netherlands 13 313 0.7× 557 2.0× 60 0.2× 153 0.6× 78 1.1× 24 806
Karin Denton United Kingdom 17 462 1.1× 709 2.6× 85 0.3× 276 1.0× 80 1.1× 35 1.1k
Shalini Singh India 13 138 0.3× 147 0.5× 129 0.5× 81 0.3× 98 1.3× 37 543
B W Codling United Kingdom 12 247 0.6× 346 1.3× 90 0.3× 126 0.5× 142 1.9× 26 688

Countries citing papers authored by A. Deery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Deery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Deery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Deery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Deery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Deery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Deery. The network helps show where A. Deery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Deery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Deery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Deery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Deery. A. Deery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pepper, Christopher B., et al.. (2014). Investigation strategy in the management of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary presenting as cervical lymphadenopathy. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 134(8). 838–842. 6 indexed citations
3.
Hay, Ashley, et al.. (2011). Value of fine needle aspiration cytology in head and neck lymphoma: Experience in a head and neck cancer unit in the United Kingdom. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 131(11). 1226–1231. 12 indexed citations
4.
Ndisang, Daniel, et al.. (2003). Detection of cervical neoplasia using measurement of Brn-3a in cervical smears with persistent minor abnormality. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 13(4). 515–517. 6 indexed citations
5.
Singer, Albert, et al.. (2003). A real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening: A multicenter evaluation. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 13(6). 804–811. 13 indexed citations
6.
Singer, Albert, et al.. (2003). A real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening: A multicenter evaluation. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 13(6). 804–811. 38 indexed citations
7.
Lipman, Marc, et al.. (2000). Infrequency of Pulmonary Microbial Colonisation Prior to Respiratory Disease in HIV-Infected Individuals. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 19(9). 699–703. 1 indexed citations
8.
Nagele, Fritz, Fritz Wieser, A. Deery, Roger Hart, & Adam Magos. (1999). Endometrial cell dissemination at diagnostic hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized cross-over comparison of normal saline and carbon dioxide uterine distension. Human Reproduction. 14(11). 2739–2742. 40 indexed citations
9.
Ćwikła, Jarosław B., John Buscombe, S. P. Parbhoo, et al.. (1998). Comparison of accuracy of scintimammography and X-ray mammography in the diagnosis of primary breast cancer in patients selected for surgical biopsy. Clinical Radiology. 53(4). 274–280. 23 indexed citations
10.
Ćwikła, Jarosław B., et al.. (1998). Use of 99Tcm-MIBI in the assessment of patients with suspected recurrent breast cancer. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 19(7). 649–656. 17 indexed citations
11.
Ćwikła, Jarosław B., John Buscombe, S. P. Parbhoo, et al.. (1997). The effect of chemotherapy on the uptake of technetium-99m sestamibi in breast cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 24(9). 1175–1178. 13 indexed citations
12.
O'Sullivan, J P, S M Ismail, W. S. Barnes, et al.. (1996). Inter‐ and intra‐observer variation in the reporting of cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists versus histopathologists. Cytopathology. 7(2). 78–89. 18 indexed citations
13.
Deery, A., et al.. (1995). Increased CA 125 in a patient with tuberculous peritonitis: case report and review of published works.. Gut. 36(2). 303–305. 40 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Patrick, et al.. (1994). Relation between human papillomavirus type 16 and potential for progression of minor-grade cervical disease. The Lancet. 344(8920). 432–435. 33 indexed citations
15.
O'Sullivan, J P, S M Ismail, W. S. Barnes, et al.. (1994). Interobserver variation in the diagnosis and grading of dyskaryosis in cervical smears: specialist cytopathologists compared with non-specialists.. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 47(6). 515–518. 26 indexed citations
17.
Kurzawinski, Tomasz R., A. Deery, James Dooley, et al.. (1993). A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology. 18(6). 1399–1403. 103 indexed citations
18.
Kurzawinski, Tomasz R., A. Deery, James Dooley, et al.. (1992). A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.. Gut. 33(12). 1675–1677. 77 indexed citations
19.
Davidson, Brian R, James Dooley, A. Deery, et al.. (1992). Value of exfoliative cytology for investigating bile duct strictures.. Gut. 33(10). 1408–1411. 55 indexed citations
20.
Giles, J., A. Deery, Jesse C. Crow, & Patrick Walker. (1989). The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(9). 1067–1070. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026