Grace E. Cho

542 total citations
10 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Grace E. Cho is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Grace E. Cho has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Education and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Grace E. Cho's work include Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). Grace E. Cho is often cited by papers focused on Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). Grace E. Cho collaborates with scholars based in United States. Grace E. Cho's co-authors include Peggy J. Miller, Todd L. Sandel, Jeana Bracey, Suhua Wang, Cara Wong, Ilse C. F. Ipsen, Su‐hua Wang, Elizabeth A. Nick, Farrah Jacquez and Joseph Lee Rodgers and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing and Political Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Grace E. Cho

10 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Grace E. Cho United States	7	157	111	102	57	53	10	335
Mano Candappa United Kingdom	11	207 1.3×	136 1.2×	273 2.7×	145 2.5×	53 1.0×	25	420
Georg Lorenz Germany	9	171 1.1×	78 0.7×	320 3.1×	39 0.7×	31 0.6×	20	455
Lysann Zander Germany	14	158 1.0×	184 1.7×	196 1.9×	83 1.5×	49 0.9×	47	513
Michel Knigge Germany	10	78 0.5×	62 0.6×	202 2.0×	29 0.5×	51 1.0×	36	312
Rachel Dinkes	6	125 0.8×	261 2.4×	334 3.3×	100 1.8×	88 1.7×	15	516
Felice Carugati Italy	12	77 0.5×	173 1.6×	168 1.6×	58 1.0×	83 1.6×	43	379
Pablo del Río Spain	9	53 0.3×	89 0.8×	127 1.2×	18 0.3×	91 1.7×	55	338
Jeremy Sawyer United States	9	128 0.8×	58 0.5×	182 1.8×	88 1.5×	79 1.5×	18	362
Abbas Türnüklü Türkiye	12	220 1.4×	193 1.7×	200 2.0×	83 1.5×	19 0.4×	54	467
Andrew Pilecki United States	8	207 1.3×	112 1.0×	22 0.2×	38 0.7×	20 0.4×	14	306

Countries citing papers authored by Grace E. Cho

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace E. Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace E. Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace E. Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace E. Cho

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace E. Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace E. Cho. The network helps show where Grace E. Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grace E. Cho

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grace E. Cho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grace E. Cho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grace E. Cho. Grace E. Cho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Cole, David A., et al.. (2020). The Peer Victimization in College Survey: Construction and validation.. Psychological Assessment. 32(9). 851–871. 4 indexed citations

2.

Miller, Peggy J. & Grace E. Cho. (2017). Self-Esteem in Time and Place. Oxford University Press eBooks. 11 indexed citations

3.

Miller, Peggy J. & Grace E. Cho. (2017). Origins of the Self-Esteem Imaginary. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

4.

Sandel, Todd L., et al.. (2006). What It Means to be a Grandmother: A Cross-Cultural Study of Taiwanese and Euro-American Grandmothers' Beliefs. Journal of Family Communication. 6(4). 255–278. 18 indexed citations

5.

Miller, Peggy J., Grace E. Cho, & Jeana Bracey. (2005). Working-Class Children’s Experience through the Prism of Personal Storytelling. Human Development. 48(3). 115–135. 79 indexed citations

6.

Miller, Peggy J., Grace E. Cho, & Jeana Bracey. (2005). Expanding the Angle of Vision on Working-Class Children’s Stories. Human Development. 48(3). 151–154. 5 indexed citations

7.

Cho, Grace E., Todd L. Sandel, Peggy J. Miller, & Su‐hua Wang. (2005). What Do Grandmothers Think about Self‐esteem? American and Taiwanese Folk Theories Revisited. Social Development. 14(4). 701–721. 26 indexed citations

8.

Wong, Cara & Grace E. Cho. (2005). Two‐Headed Coins or Kandinskys: White Racial Identification. Political Psychology. 26(5). 699–720. 51 indexed citations

9.

Miller, Peggy J., Suhua Wang, Todd L. Sandel, & Grace E. Cho. (2002). Self-Esteem as Folk Theory: A Comparison of European American and Taiwanese Mothers' Beliefs. Parenting. 2(3). 209–239. 112 indexed citations

10.

Cho, Grace E., et al.. (1998). The Lack of Influence of the Right-Hand Side on the Accuracy of Linear System Solution. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 20(1). 203–227. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact