Godfrey Vesey
- Philosophy top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- William CharltonAntony FlewJohn L. PollockG. A. J. RogersJohn WisdomJohn HickCharles HartshorneIan T. Ramsey
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers)Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoCzechia
In The Last Decade
Godfrey Vesey
36 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Philosophy 89
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
- Sociology and Political Science 36
- History and Philosophy of Science 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 29
Countries citing papers authored by Godfrey Vesey
This map shows the geographic impact of Godfrey Vesey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Godfrey Vesey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Godfrey Vesey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Godfrey Vesey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Godfrey Vesey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Godfrey Vesey. The network helps show where Godfrey Vesey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Godfrey Vesey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Godfrey Vesey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Godfrey Vesey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Godfrey Vesey. Godfrey Vesey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | An enquiry into the nature of the human soul : wherein the immateriality of the soul is evinced from the principles of reason and philosophy : in two volumes | 2 |
| 3 | Agency and necessity | 11 |
| 4 | Idealism, past and present | 32 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Kant's Copernican revolution, speculative philosophy | 0 |
| 11 | Descartes: father of modern philosophy | 1 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | The Embodied Mind | 6 |
| 15 | Body and mind : readings in philosophy | 4 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Godfrey Vesey
Godfrey Vesey is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Gender Studies, having authored 40 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (89 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations). Godfrey Vesey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include William Charlton, Antony Flew, John L. Pollock, G. A. J. Rogers, John Wisdom, John Hick, Charles Hartshorne, Ian T. Ramsey, H. D. Lewis and Andrew Baxter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Philosophical Review and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.