Godfrey Vesey
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 1
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 1
- General Arts and Humanities top 10%
-
- Political Theory and Influence 1
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 1
- Co-authors
- William CharltonAntony FlewJohn L. PollockG. A. J. RogersJohn WisdomJohn HickCharles HartshorneIan T. Ramsey
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoCzechia
In The Last Decade
Godfrey Vesey
36 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Philosophy 89
- History and Philosophy of Science 33
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
- General Arts and Humanities 4
- General Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Godfrey Vesey
This map shows the geographic impact of Godfrey Vesey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Godfrey Vesey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Godfrey Vesey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Godfrey Vesey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Godfrey Vesey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Godfrey Vesey. The network helps show where Godfrey Vesey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Godfrey Vesey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 2 | An enquiry into the nature of the human soul : wherein the immateriality of the soul is evinced from the principles of reason and philosophy : in two volumes | 1990 | 2 |
| 3 | Agency and necessity | 1987 | 11 |
| 4 | Idealism, past and present | 1982 | 32 |
| 5 | 1982 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 10 | Kant's Copernican revolution, speculative philosophy | 1972 | 0 |
| 11 | Descartes: father of modern philosophy | 1971 | 1 |
| 12 | 1970 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 7 | |
| 14 | The Embodied Mind | 1965 | 6 |
| 15 | Body and mind : readings in philosophy | 1964 | 4 |
| 16 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1954 | 1 |
About Godfrey Vesey
Godfrey Vesey is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Gender Studies, having authored 40 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (1 paper), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (89 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations). Godfrey Vesey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include William Charlton, Antony Flew, John L. Pollock, G. A. J. Rogers, John Wisdom, John Hick, Charles Hartshorne, Ian T. Ramsey, H. D. Lewis and Andrew Baxter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Philosophical Review and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.