H. D. Lewis
- Philosophy top 5%
- Neurology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Morris WeitzA. GoldmanLinda L. ClarkMario MerliniMark WardMichael J. O’NeillMeindert DanhofGareth Ball
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers)Muon and positron interactions and applications (1 paper)
- Journals
- Applied Physics LettersJournal of the American Ceramic SocietyReview of Scientific Instruments
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
H. D. Lewis
24 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Philosophy 56
- Neurology 31
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 26
- Political Science and International Relations 20
Countries citing papers authored by H. D. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of H. D. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. D. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. D. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. D. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. D. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. D. Lewis. The network helps show where H. D. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. D. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. D. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. D. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. D. Lewis. H. D. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 | |
| 2 | Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements Third Series | 5 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Ethics and defence : power and responsibility in the nuclear age | 1 |
| 7 | The elusive self | 9 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Philosophy, East and West : essays in honour of Dr. T. M. P. Mahadevan | 1 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About H. D. Lewis
H. D. Lewis is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Muon and positron interactions and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (56 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and Neurology (31 citations). H. D. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Morris Weitz, A. Goldman, Linda L. Clark, Mario Merlini, Mark Ward, Michael J. O’Neill, Meindert Danhof, Gareth Ball, Paulien Ravenstijn and Marjolijn Hameetman. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Review of Scientific Instruments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.