P. H. Nidditch

13 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

P. H. Nidditch
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Philosophy 96
  • History and Philosophy of Science 55
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 37
Replace Joachim Ritter with:
Joachim Ritter
Nicholas White United States
G. H. R. Parkinson United Kingdom
Charles Parsons United States
William Kingdon Clifford Ireland
Hiram Caton Australia
J. Michael Young United States
Editors Grazer Philosophische studien
Jack W. Meiland United States
Godfrey Vesey United Kingdom
P. H. Nidditch relative to Joachim Ritter Joachim Ritter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Joachim Ritter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. H. Nidditch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. H. Nidditch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. H. Nidditch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. H. Nidditch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. H. Nidditch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. H. Nidditch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. H. Nidditch. The network helps show where P. H. Nidditch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. H. Nidditch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. H. Nidditch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. H. Nidditch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. H. Nidditch. P. H. Nidditch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding & Concerning the Principles of Morals [with] a Treatise of Human Nature
3
3
John Locke: Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Other Philosophical Writings: Volume I: Drafts a and B
8
4
The Philosophy of Science
0
5
Drafts for the Essay concerning human understanding, and other philosophical writings
32
6 1
7
David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature
123
8
Enquiries : concerning the human understanding and concerningthe principles of morals [Hume, 1975]
58
9 1
10 1
11 6
12 1
13 2
14 1
15 2
16 0
17 0
18 2

About P. H. Nidditch

P. H. Nidditch is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (55 citations), Philosophy (96 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). P. H. Nidditch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Hume, G. A. J. Rogers, John Locke, Steven Orey, Bede Rundle, Évandro Agazzi, Martin Davis, Geoffrey Sayre‐McCord and Louis O. Kattsoff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Mathematical Monthly and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026