Glenn Patrick Williams

430 total citations
8 papers, 14 citations indexed

About

Glenn Patrick Williams is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Glenn Patrick Williams has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 14 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Glenn Patrick Williams's work include Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers). Glenn Patrick Williams is often cited by papers focused on Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers). Glenn Patrick Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Ireland. Glenn Patrick Williams's co-authors include Mark Wetherell, Vera Kempe, Yuki Kamide, Anuenue Kukona, Clare E. Collins, Michael Smith, Gail Kinman, Nicola O’Brien, Amanda Ellison and Lucie Byrne‐Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Glenn Patrick Williams

6 papers receiving 14 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Glenn Patrick Williams United Kingdom	3	5	4	3	2	2	8	14
Emily Darley United Kingdom	2	4 0.8×	7 1.8×	4 1.3×			2	8
Henry Herbert Goddard	2	4 0.8×	3 0.8×	4 1.3×		2 1.0×	3	15
Lee Tbaily United Kingdom	4	7 1.4×	6 1.5×	5 1.7×			5	25
G Jimmy Switzerland	3	5 1.0×	3 0.8×	3 1.0×		1 0.5×	5	12
Katharine M. Banham Bridges Canada	2	4 0.8×	4 1.0×	3 1.0×		1 0.5×	2	11
A. Garcia-Gutierrez Spain	3	2 0.4×	5 1.3×	3 1.0×	1 0.5×		3	12
Alberto Orso Maria Iorio Argentina	3	6 1.2×	6 1.5×				4	11
Michele Anne Malaysia	3	5 1.0×	6 1.5×				4	11
Michael Miklos United States	2	7 1.4×	5 1.3×				2	7
Cheryl Alyssa Welch United States	3	4 0.8×	3 0.8×			4 2.0×	3	13

Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Patrick Williams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Patrick Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Patrick Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Patrick Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Patrick Williams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Patrick Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Patrick Williams. The network helps show where Glenn Patrick Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenn Patrick Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenn Patrick Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenn Patrick Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenn Patrick Williams. Glenn Patrick Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Smith, Michael, Nicola O’Brien, Dawn Branley-Bell, et al.. (2025). Facilitators and barriers to engaging in expressive writing among health and social care professionals. PLoS ONE. 20(8). e0328801–e0328801.

2.

Wetherell, Mark, et al.. (2024). Assessing the psychobiological demands of high-fidelity training in pre-hospital emergency medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 32(1). 101–101. 4 indexed citations

3.

Dunne, Stephen, et al.. (2023). Uncovering the social determinants of brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Health Psychology. 28(10). 956–969.

4.

Williams, Glenn Patrick, et al.. (2023). Time spent playing video games during periods of isolation has no effect on loneliness or mental health. Behaviour and Information Technology. 43(13). 3170–3191. 2 indexed citations

5.

Williams, Glenn Patrick, et al.. (2021). Exposure to dialect variation in an artificial language prior to literacy training impairs reading of words with competing variants but does not affect decoding skills.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 48(12). 1868–1904. 1 indexed citations

6.

Williams, Glenn Patrick, et al.. (2020). How does dialect exposure affect learning to read and spell? An artificial orthography study.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 149(12). 2344–2375. 3 indexed citations

7.

Williams, Glenn Patrick, Anuenue Kukona, & Yuki Kamide. (2019). Spatial narrative context modulates semantic (but not visual) competition during discourse processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 108. 104030–104030. 3 indexed citations

8.

Williams, Glenn Patrick, Anuenue Kukona, & Yuki Kamide. (2014). Representing spatial shifts in event processing. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact