Amanda Ellison

2.7k total citations
57 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Amanda Ellison is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Ellison has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Neurology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Ellison's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (20 papers). Amanda Ellison is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (20 papers). Amanda Ellison collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Amanda Ellison's co-authors include Vincent Walsh, Matthew F. S. Rushworth, Alan Cowey, Daniel T. Smith, Thomas Schenk, Keira Ball, Peter Moseley, Vincent Walsh, Lorella Battelli and Charles Fernyhough and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Ellison

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Ellison United Kingdom 25 1.6k 432 195 177 157 57 2.0k
Dario Cazzoli Switzerland 25 1.2k 0.8× 601 1.4× 92 0.5× 154 0.9× 152 1.0× 84 1.7k
Tjeerd W. Boonstra Australia 30 1.5k 0.9× 375 0.9× 228 1.2× 181 1.0× 177 1.1× 65 2.4k
Sook‐Lei Liew United States 22 747 0.5× 351 0.8× 236 1.2× 343 1.9× 115 0.7× 57 1.4k
Maria Pia Viggiano Italy 27 1.5k 0.9× 253 0.6× 507 2.6× 294 1.7× 162 1.0× 107 2.1k
Robert D. McIntosh United Kingdom 30 2.4k 1.5× 176 0.4× 203 1.0× 500 2.8× 158 1.0× 115 2.7k
Timothy L. Hodgson United Kingdom 27 1.6k 1.0× 210 0.5× 349 1.8× 225 1.3× 219 1.4× 91 2.4k
Dylan M. Nielson United States 17 977 0.6× 166 0.4× 193 1.0× 97 0.5× 76 0.5× 35 1.7k
Silvia Erika Kober Austria 26 1.4k 0.8× 105 0.2× 178 0.9× 161 0.9× 181 1.2× 67 2.0k
Eva Feredoes United Kingdom 16 1.5k 0.9× 974 2.3× 187 1.0× 77 0.4× 161 1.0× 31 1.9k
Olivier A. Coubard France 18 508 0.3× 308 0.7× 121 0.6× 73 0.4× 131 0.8× 43 905

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Ellison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Ellison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Ellison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Ellison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Ellison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Ellison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Ellison. The network helps show where Amanda Ellison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Ellison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Ellison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Ellison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Ellison. Amanda Ellison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Castellani, Brian, et al.. (2023). A Scoping Review of the Effects of Ambient Air Quality on Cognitive Frailty. Environments. 11(1). 4–4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Castellani, Brian, et al.. (2023). A Scoping Review of the Effects of Ambient Air Quality on Cognitive Frailty. Preprints.org. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hind, Karen, Patria Hume, Alice Theadom, et al.. (2021). Mental Health and Wellbeing of Retired Elite and Amateur Rugby Players and Non-contact Athletes and Associations with Sports-Related Concussion: The UK Rugby Health Project. Sports Medicine. 52(6). 1419–1431. 22 indexed citations
4.
Todd, Adam, Nasima Akhter, Joanne‐Marie Cairns, et al.. (2018). The Pain Divide: a cross-sectional analysis of chronic pain prevalence, pain intensity and opioid utilisation in England. BMJ Open. 8(7). e023391–e023391. 24 indexed citations
5.
Ellison, Amanda, et al.. (2017). The Behavioral Effects of tDCS on Visual Search Performance Are Not Influenced by the Location of the Reference Electrode. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 11. 520–520. 3 indexed citations
6.
Moseley, Peter, David Smailes, Amanda Ellison, & Charles Fernyhough. (2015). The effect of auditory verbal imagery on signal detection in hallucination-prone individuals. Cognition. 146. 206–216. 26 indexed citations
8.
Moseley, Peter, Charles Fernyhough, & Amanda Ellison. (2013). Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 37(10). 2794–2805. 76 indexed citations
9.
Ball, Keira, et al.. (2011). Spatial priming in visual search: memory for body-centred information. Experimental Brain Research. 212(3). 477–485. 3 indexed citations
10.
Ball, Keira, Daniel T. Smith, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2010). A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search. Experimental Brain Research. 204(4). 585–594. 16 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Daniel T., Keira Ball, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2009). Deficits of reflexive attention induced by abduction of the eye. Neuropsychologia. 48(5). 1269–1276. 30 indexed citations
12.
Ball, Keira, Daniel T. Smith, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2008). Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search. Neuropsychologia. 47(6). 1585–1591. 36 indexed citations
13.
Ellison, Amanda, Amy R. Lane, & Thomas Schenk. (2007). The Interaction of Brain Regions during Visual Search Processing as Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Cerebral Cortex. 17(11). 2579–2584. 40 indexed citations
14.
Ellison, Amanda & Alan Cowey. (2006). TMS can reveal contrasting functions of the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams. Experimental Brain Research. 175(4). 618–625. 33 indexed citations
15.
Ellison, Amanda, Matthew F. S. Rushworth, & Vincent Walsh. (2003). Chapter 33 The parietal cortex in visual search: a visuomotor hypothesis. Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology. 56. 321–330. 41 indexed citations
16.
Ellison, Amanda, Lorella Battelli, Alan Cowey, & Vincent Walsh. (2003). The effect of expectation on facilitation of colour/form conjunction tasks by TMS over area V5. Neuropsychologia. 41(13). 1794–1801. 25 indexed citations
17.
Rushworth, Matthew F. S., Amanda Ellison, & Vincent Walsh. (2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience. 4(6). 656–661. 332 indexed citations
18.
Walsh, Vincent & Amanda Ellison. (2001). Visual field asymmetries in attention and learning. Spatial Vision. 14(1). 3–9. 20 indexed citations
19.
Ellison, Amanda & Vincent Walsh. (1998). Perceptual learning in visual search: Some evidence of specificities. Vision Research. 38(3). 333–345. 43 indexed citations
20.
Walsh, Vincent, Amanda Ellison, Elisabeth Ashbridge, & Alan Cowey. (1998). The role of the parietal cortex in visual attention—hemispheric asymmetries and the effects of learning: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia. 37(2). 245–251. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026