Gladys Lee

1.4k citations
22 papers · 730 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gladys Lee

21 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers

Gladys Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Accounting 298
  • Information Systems and Management 164
  • Strategy and Management 171
  • Finance 42
  • Information Systems 91
Replace Brad S. Trinkle with:
Brad S. Trinkle United States
Jay C. Thibodeau United States
Errol R. Iselin Australia
Colin Ferguson Australia
Amit Das Qatar
Jackie Rees Ulmer United States
Herman Manakyan United States
Michael A. Wiles United States
Kinsun Tam United States
Andrea Patacconi United Kingdom
Gladys Lee relative to Brad S. Trinkle United States Brad S. Trinkle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Brad S. Trinkle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gladys Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gladys Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gladys Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gladys Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gladys Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gladys Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gladys Lee. The network helps show where Gladys Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gladys Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gladys Lee Line = papers co-authored together Gladys Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018105
2 201295
3 201791
4 200090
5 201677
6 201875
7 202134
8 201733
9 201823
10 202021
11 201814
12 201914
13 201810
14 201010
15 201710
16 20169
17 20208
18
Whistleblowing on Accounting-Related Misconduct: A Synthesis of the Literature
20186
19
Audit Committees Response to Key Audit Matters and Note Disclosures
20192
20 20182

About Gladys Lee

Gladys Lee is a scholar working on Accounting, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (5 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers), Information and Cyber Security (2 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (298 citations), Information Systems and Management (164 citations), Strategy and Management (171 citations), Finance (42 citations) and Information Systems (91 citations). Gladys Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neil Fargher, Yu Flora Kuang, Xinning Xiao, Jonathan Jona, Henk Berkman, Naomi S. Soderstrom, Christian Schindler, Robert G. Collum, Bo Qin and Vic Naiker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Corporate Finance and Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact