Gitte Keidser

3.6k total citations
107 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Gitte Keidser is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Gitte Keidser has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 61 papers in Speech and Hearing and 32 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Gitte Keidser's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (85 papers), Noise Effects and Management (61 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (32 papers). Gitte Keidser is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (85 papers), Noise Effects and Management (61 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (32 papers). Gitte Keidser collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Gitte Keidser's co-authors include Harvey Dillon, Elizabeth Convery, Teresa Y. C. Ching, Denis Byrne, Scott Brewer, Jörg M. Buchholz, Richard Katsch, Lyndal Carter, Mark Seeto and Louise Hickson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Gitte Keidser

105 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gitte Keidser Australia 28 2.4k 1.7k 927 761 339 107 2.7k
Graham Naylor United Kingdom 27 3.2k 1.3× 2.1k 1.3× 644 0.7× 1.0k 1.3× 562 1.7× 77 3.7k
Susan Scollie Canada 29 2.3k 0.9× 952 0.6× 791 0.9× 1.1k 1.4× 436 1.3× 120 2.5k
Ruth A. Bentler United States 29 2.8k 1.1× 1.7k 1.0× 785 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 762 2.2× 105 3.2k
Lena L. N. Wong Hong Kong 23 1.6k 0.7× 736 0.4× 630 0.7× 694 0.9× 338 1.0× 96 1.9k
Benjamin W. Y. Hornsby United States 27 2.7k 1.1× 1.7k 1.0× 557 0.6× 909 1.2× 497 1.5× 71 3.0k
Pamela E. Souza United States 36 3.7k 1.5× 2.1k 1.3× 1.3k 1.4× 1.3k 1.8× 309 0.9× 141 4.0k
Todd A. Ricketts United States 30 2.6k 1.0× 1.8k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 860 1.1× 265 0.8× 100 2.7k
Denis Byrne Australia 18 2.0k 0.8× 1.4k 0.8× 817 0.9× 861 1.1× 204 0.6× 38 2.1k
Michael J. Nilsson United States 6 1.7k 0.7× 1.0k 0.6× 797 0.9× 637 0.8× 158 0.5× 22 1.9k
Richard C. Seewald Canada 26 1.9k 0.8× 910 0.5× 614 0.7× 899 1.2× 394 1.2× 60 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Gitte Keidser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gitte Keidser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gitte Keidser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gitte Keidser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gitte Keidser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gitte Keidser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gitte Keidser. The network helps show where Gitte Keidser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gitte Keidser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gitte Keidser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gitte Keidser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gitte Keidser. Gitte Keidser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Akeroyd, Michael A., Louise Hickson, Inga Holube, et al.. (2024). Evaluating the ecological validity of spatial hearing. 411–414. 1 indexed citations
2.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2023). The Effects of Noise and Simulated Conductive Hearing Loss on Physiological Response Measures During Interactive Conversations. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 66(10). 4009–4024. 6 indexed citations
3.
Skoglund, Martin A., et al.. (2023). Multilevel Modeling of Gaze From Listeners With Hearing Loss Following a Realistic Conversation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 66(11). 4575–4589.
4.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2020). Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids. Trends in Hearing. 24. 2761945104–2761945104. 6 indexed citations
5.
Miles, Kelly, et al.. (2020). Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147(3). 1562–1576. 23 indexed citations
6.
Convery, Elizabeth, et al.. (2019). A Smartphone App to Facilitate Remote Patient-Provider Communication in Hearing Health Care: Usability and Effect on Hearing Aid Outcomes. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 26(6). 798–804. 27 indexed citations
7.
Buchholz, Jörg M., et al.. (2018). Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation. Speech Communication. 100. 18–29. 38 indexed citations
8.
Best, Virginia, et al.. (2016). A Dynamic Speech Comprehension Test for Assessing Real-World Listening Ability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 27(7). 515–526. 23 indexed citations
9.
Keidser, Gitte, Mark Seeto, Mary Rudner, Staffan Hygge, & Jer­ker Rönnberg. (2015). On the relationship between functional hearing and depression. International Journal of Audiology. 54(10). 653–664. 41 indexed citations
10.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2015). Cognitive spare capacity: evaluation data and its association with comprehension of dynamic conversations. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 597–597. 19 indexed citations
11.
Best, Virginia, et al.. (2015). Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension. International Journal of Audiology. 55(1). 45–52. 24 indexed citations
12.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2013). Real-Life Efficacy and Reliability of Training a Hearing Aid. Ear and Hearing. 34(5). 619–629. 23 indexed citations
13.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2012). NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments. PubMed. 16(4). 211–223. 94 indexed citations
14.
Convery, Elizabeth, Gitte Keidser, Harvey Dillon, & Lisa Hartley. (2011). A Self-Fitting Hearing Aid. PubMed. 15(4). 157–166. 33 indexed citations
15.
Convery, Elizabeth, et al.. (2011). Management of Hearing Aid Assembly by Urban-Dwelling Hearing-Impaired Adults in a Developed Country. PubMed. 15(4). 196–208. 23 indexed citations
16.
Keidser, Gitte, Ruth A. Bentler, & Jürgen Kießling. (2010). A multi-site evaluation of a proposed test for verifying hearing aid maximum output. International Journal of Audiology. 49(1). 14–23. 1 indexed citations
17.
Keidser, Gitte, et al.. (2008). Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology. 47(10). 621–635. 27 indexed citations
19.
Keidser, Gitte, Harvey Dillon, & D. Byrne. (1998). The change in overall level, spectral shape, and loudness perception of speech produced with different vocal effort. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 20(1). 21–31. 2 indexed citations
20.
Keidser, Gitte. (1991). Computerized Measurement of Speech Intelligibility II.: Normative Data from a ‘Closed Response’ Test. Scandinavian Audiology. 20(3). 153–158. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026