Gill Scott

478 total citations
10 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Gill Scott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gill Scott has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Gill Scott's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). Gill Scott is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). Gill Scott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Gill Scott's co-authors include Paul Fitzsimmons, Benedict Michael, Gordon Grant, Angela M. Brown, Marian Peacock, Katherine Froggatt, Sandra Varey, Sheila Payne, Mary Turner and Bob Gibson and has published in prestigious journals such as Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, International Journal of Palliative Nursing and BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

In The Last Decade

Gill Scott

10 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gill Scott United Kingdom	6	148	56	52	48	47	10	317
Enkhzaya Chuluunbaatar Taiwan	5	129 0.9×	24 0.4×	120 2.3×	138 2.9×	24 0.5×	7	336
Sook Ching Yang United Kingdom	7	64 0.4×	27 0.5×	86 1.7×	160 3.3×	26 0.6×	8	312
Michael R. Schmitt United States	8	236 1.6×	47 0.8×	62 1.2×	41 0.9×	69 1.5×	8	405
Tricia Pendergrast United States	8	99 0.7×	40 0.7×	76 1.5×	46 1.0×	18 0.4×	22	309
Adriana Silvina Pagano Brazil	11	89 0.6×	45 0.8×	7 0.1×	28 0.6×	65 1.4×	76	363
Sehar-un-Nisa Hassan Saudi Arabia	10	74 0.5×	43 0.8×	81 1.6×	72 1.5×	8 0.2×	35	439
Sharon Parsons United States	9	211 1.4×	41 0.7×	74 1.4×	139 2.9×	20 0.4×	20	444
Arleen Marcia Tuchman United States	7	178 1.2×	39 0.7×	48 0.9×	43 0.9×	6 0.1×	21	344
Jenny Johnston United Kingdom	10	115 0.8×	63 1.1×	24 0.5×	53 1.1×	15 0.3×	16	317
Ryan Allred United States	10	44 0.3×	29 0.5×	27 0.5×	64 1.3×	10 0.2×	17	266

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Scott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Scott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Scott. The network helps show where Gill Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Scott. Gill Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Turner, Mary, Marian Peacock, Sandra Varey, et al.. (2016). Involving prisoners in action research to improve palliative care: findings from the ‘both sides of the fence’ study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 6(3). 402.3–403. 1 indexed citations

2.

Fitzsimmons, Paul, et al.. (2012). Older participants are frequently excluded from Parkinson's disease research. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 18(5). 585–589. 38 indexed citations

3.

Scott, Gill, et al.. (2012). Educating prison staff in the principles of end-of-life care. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 18(8). 391–395. 6 indexed citations

4.

Fitzsimmons, Paul, et al.. (2010). A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 40(4). 292–296. 164 indexed citations

5.

Scott, Gill. (2010). Motivational interviewing. 2: How to apply this approach in nursing practice.. PubMed. 106(35). 21–2. 4 indexed citations

6.

Scott, Gill. (2010). Motivational interviewing 1: background, principles and application in healthcare.. PubMed. 106(34). 21–2. 5 indexed citations

7.

Scott, Gill, et al.. (2005). Adjustment problems of Iranian international students in Scotland. International education journal. 6(4). 484–493. 48 indexed citations

8.

Scott, Gill & Angela M. Brown. (2004). Boundary angst and negotiation in palliative care. 5(4). 195–205. 3 indexed citations

9.

Scott, Gill, et al.. (2001). The study of family carers of people with a life-threatening illness 1: the carers’ needs analysis. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 7(6). 290–297. 32 indexed citations

10.

Scott, Gill. (2001). A study of family carers of people with a life-threatening illness 2: implications of the needs assessment. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 7(7). 323–330. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact