G.H.M. van Lith

736 citations
51 papers · 455 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Papers in

    • Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity 10
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 9
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions 7
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 7
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 5

G.H.M. van Lith

45 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

G.H.M. van Lith
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Ophthalmology 230
  • Sensory Systems 46
  • Neurology 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 78
  • Rheumatology 52
Replace J W Howe with:
J W Howe United Kingdom
Hisao Ohde Japan
Kiyotaka Nakamagoe Japan
N.B. Bahuth Lebanon
A Barrada United Kingdom
P Kjer Denmark
Milton N. Moraes-Filho Brazil
Kirk A. Gilbert United States
Reiko Matsushita Japan
Marc Sarossy Australia
G.H.M. van Lith relative to J W Howe United Kingdom J W Howe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
J W Howe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.H.M. van Lith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.H.M. van Lith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.H.M. van Lith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.H.M. van Lith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.H.M. van Lith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.H.M. van Lith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.H.M. van Lith. The network helps show where G.H.M. van Lith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside G.H.M. van Lith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.H.M. van Lith Line = papers co-authored together G.H.M. van Lith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199727
2 19911
3 199011
4 19842
5 198312
6 198210
7 19826
8 19815
9 19819
10 19813
11 19803
12 198014
13 197910
14 19784
15 19770
16 19747
17 19720
18 197216
19 19701
20 196713

About G.H.M. van Lith

G.H.M. van Lith is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (10 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (230 citations), Sensory Systems (46 citations), Neurology (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations) and Rheumatology (52 citations). G.H.M. van Lith has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Josef Balí­k, B.C.P. Polak, R. Wijngaarde, Peter J. Ringens, H.E. Henkes, Bárbara Schmidt, E. Dodt, D. Wittebol‐Post, Luc Crevits and Ger H. M. B. van Rens. Their work appears in journals such as Documenta Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmic Research, Vision Research and Acta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026