G.H.M. van Lith
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity 10
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 9
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 7
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 7
- Neural dynamics and brain function 5
- Co-authors
- Josef BalíkB.C.P. PolakR. WijngaardePeter J. RingensH.E. HenkesBárbara SchmidtE. DodtD. Wittebol‐Post
- Journals
- Documenta Ophthalmologica (23 papers)Ophthalmologica (12 papers)Ophthalmic Research (4 papers)Vision Research (3 papers)Acta Ophthalmologica (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
G.H.M. van Lith
45 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ophthalmology 230
- Sensory Systems 46
- Neurology 39
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
- Rheumatology 52
Countries citing papers authored by G.H.M. van Lith
This map shows the geographic impact of G.H.M. van Lith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.H.M. van Lith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.H.M. van Lith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.H.M. van Lith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.H.M. van Lith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.H.M. van Lith. The network helps show where G.H.M. van Lith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside G.H.M. van Lith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1979 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 13 |
About G.H.M. van Lith
G.H.M. van Lith is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (10 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (230 citations), Sensory Systems (46 citations), Neurology (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations) and Rheumatology (52 citations). G.H.M. van Lith has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Josef Balík, B.C.P. Polak, R. Wijngaarde, Peter J. Ringens, H.E. Henkes, Bárbara Schmidt, E. Dodt, D. Wittebol‐Post, Luc Crevits and Ger H. M. B. van Rens. Their work appears in journals such as Documenta Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmic Research, Vision Research and Acta Ophthalmologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.