Documenta Ophthalmologica

3.3k papers and 50.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica in the last decades have received a total of 50.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica usually cover Ophthalmology (1.6k papers), Molecular Biology (1.4k papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (687 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Development and Disorders (1.2k papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (640 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (551 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Documenta Ophthalmologica are Michael F. Marmor, Michael Bach, Graham E. Holder, Mitchell Brigell, Paul Witkovsky, Eberhart Zrenner, Daphne L. McCulloch, José Cunha‐Vaz, A. Hughes and T. J. T. P. Van Den Berg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica.

Countries where authors publish in Documenta Ophthalmologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Documenta Ophthalmologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Documenta Ophthalmologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Documenta Ophthalmologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025