Georges Skandalis
- Mathematical Physics top 0.5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 1%
- Geometry and Topology top 1%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Saad BaajAlain ConnesMichel HilsumPierre de la HarpeGennadi KasparovVincent LafforgueNigel HigsonGuoliang Yu
- Topics
- Advanced Operator Algebra Research (29 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (24 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Georges Skandalis
36 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Mathematical Physics 1.2k
- Algebra and Number Theory 860
- Geometry and Topology 636
- Applied Mathematics 180
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
Countries citing papers authored by Georges Skandalis
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Skandalis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Skandalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Skandalis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Skandalis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Skandalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Skandalis. The network helps show where Georges Skandalis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georges Skandalis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georges Skandalis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georges Skandalis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Georges Skandalis. Georges Skandalis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | Topological Kac cohomology for bicrossed products | 4 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 92 | |
| 11 | Progrès récents sur la conjecture de Baum-Connes. Contribution de Vincent Lafforgue | 7 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Algèbres de von Neumann de groupes libres et probabilités non commutatives | 1 |
| 14 | Approche de la conjecture de Novikov par la cohomologie cyclique | 5 |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Georges Skandalis
Georges Skandalis is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Operator Algebra Research (29 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (24 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (860 citations), Mathematical Physics (1.2k citations) and Geometry and Topology (636 citations). Georges Skandalis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Saad Baaj, Alain Connes, Michel Hilsum, Pierre de la Harpe, Gennadi Kasparov, Vincent Lafforgue, Nigel Higson, Guoliang Yu, Thierry Fack and Boris Tsygan. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Inventiones mathematicae and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.