Frederick M. Goodman

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 794 citations indexed

About

Frederick M. Goodman is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick M. Goodman has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 794 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Mathematical Physics, 23 papers in Algebra and Number Theory and 20 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in Frederick M. Goodman's work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (23 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (20 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (19 papers). Frederick M. Goodman is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Topics in Algebra (23 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (20 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (19 papers). Frederick M. Goodman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frederick M. Goodman's co-authors include Vaughan F. R. Jones, Pierre de la Harpe, Hans Wenzl, Palle E. T. Jørgensen, Ola Bratteli, Tomoki Nakanishi, Philippe Biane, Alexandru Nica, S. V. Kerov and Antony Wassermann and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Psychiatric Services.

In The Last Decade

Frederick M. Goodman

34 papers receiving 675 citations

Hit Papers

Coxeter Graphs and Towers of Algebras 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick M. Goodman United States 13 541 528 467 177 75 36 794
Anatol N. Kirillov Japan 12 438 0.8× 208 0.4× 260 0.6× 345 1.9× 130 1.7× 35 579
Hans Wenzl United States 17 1.1k 2.1× 838 1.6× 555 1.2× 277 1.6× 134 1.8× 32 1.2k
Marvin I. Knopp United States 16 379 0.7× 522 1.0× 499 1.1× 140 0.8× 68 0.9× 51 813
N. C. Snaith United Kingdom 13 286 0.5× 568 1.1× 750 1.6× 284 1.6× 97 1.3× 19 984
Wolfgang Lück Germany 21 1.2k 2.2× 1.3k 2.6× 377 0.8× 188 1.1× 46 0.6× 88 1.5k
Atle Selberg United States 5 360 0.7× 517 1.0× 395 0.8× 122 0.7× 100 1.3× 6 828
Alex Eskin United States 19 797 1.5× 909 1.7× 146 0.3× 137 0.8× 157 2.1× 39 1.1k
Ruy Exel Brazil 18 409 0.8× 945 1.8× 748 1.6× 32 0.2× 92 1.2× 53 1.0k
Katsuhisa Mimachi Japan 15 530 1.0× 269 0.5× 408 0.9× 86 0.5× 299 4.0× 57 712
Anne Schilling United States 17 593 1.1× 216 0.4× 355 0.8× 355 2.0× 282 3.8× 68 704

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick M. Goodman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick M. Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick M. Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick M. Goodman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick M. Goodman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick M. Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick M. Goodman. The network helps show where Frederick M. Goodman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick M. Goodman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick M. Goodman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick M. Goodman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick M. Goodman. Frederick M. Goodman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goodman, Frederick M., et al.. (2013). Cellularity of wreath product algebras and A-Brauer algebras. Journal of Algebra. 389. 151–190. 4 indexed citations
2.
Goodman, Frederick M.. (2012). Remarks on cyclotomic and degenerate cyclotomic BMW algebras. Journal of Algebra. 364. 13–37. 5 indexed citations
3.
Goodman, Frederick M., et al.. (2010). Cellularity and the Jones basic construction. Advances in Applied Mathematics. 46(1-4). 312–362. 15 indexed citations
4.
Goodman, Frederick M.. (2010). Comparison of admissibility conditions for cyclotomic Birman–Wenzl–Murakami algebras. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 214(11). 2009–2016. 10 indexed citations
5.
Goodman, Frederick M., et al.. (2009). Cyclotomic Birman–Wenzl–Murakami Algebras, II: Admissibility Relations and Freeness. Algebras and Representation Theory. 14(1). 1–39. 10 indexed citations
6.
Goodman, Frederick M., et al.. (2009). CYCLOTOMIC BIRMAN–WENZL–MURAKAMI ALGEBRAS, I: FREENESS AND REALIZATION AS TANGLE ALGEBRAS. Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications. 18(8). 1089–1127. 12 indexed citations
7.
Goodman, Frederick M.. (2008). Cellularity of cyclotomic Birman–Wenzl–Murakami algebras. Journal of Algebra. 321(11). 3299–3320. 19 indexed citations
8.
Goodman, Frederick M., et al.. (2006). Cyclotomic Birman--Wenzl--Murakami algebras, II: Admissibility Relations and Representation theory. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
9.
Biane, Philippe, Frederick M. Goodman, & Alexandru Nica. (2003). Non-crossing cumulants of type B. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 355(6). 2263–2303. 24 indexed citations
10.
Goodman, Frederick M. & Hans Wenzl. (1999). Iwahori–Hecke Algebras of TypeAat Roots of Unity. Journal of Algebra. 215(2). 694–734. 1 indexed citations
11.
Goodman, Frederick M. & Hans Wenzl. (1990). Littlewood-Richardson coefficients for Hecke algebras at roots of unity. Advances in Mathematics. 82(2). 244–265. 71 indexed citations
12.
Bratteli, Ola, George A. Elliott, Frederick M. Goodman, & Palle E. T. Jørgensen. (1989). On Lie algebras of operators. Journal of Functional Analysis. 86(2). 341–359. 3 indexed citations
13.
Goodman, Frederick M., Pierre de la Harpe, & Vaughan F. R. Jones. (1989). Coxeter Graphs and Towers of Algebras. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 393 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Bratteli, Ola, Frederick M. Goodman, Palle E. T. Jørgensen, & Derek W. Robinson. (1988). The heat semigroup and integrability of Lie algebras. Journal of Functional Analysis. 79(2). 351–397. 7 indexed citations
15.
Bratteli, Ola, David Evans, Frederick M. Goodman, & Palle E. T. Jørgensen. (1986). A Dichotomy for Derivations on $\mathscr O_n$. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences. 22(1). 103–117. 7 indexed citations
16.
Bratteli, Ola, Frederick M. Goodman, & Palle E. T. Jørgensen. (1985). Unbounded derivations tangential to compact groups of automorphisms, II. Journal of Functional Analysis. 61(3). 247–289. 7 indexed citations
17.
Bratteli, Ola, et al.. (1985). Integration In Abelian $C^*$-Dynamical Systems. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences. 21(5). 1001–1030. 5 indexed citations
18.
Goodman, Frederick M. & Antony Wassermann. (1984). Unbounded derivations commuting with compact group actions. II. Journal of Functional Analysis. 55(3). 389–397. 7 indexed citations
19.
Goodman, Frederick M. & Palle E. T. Jørgensen. (1983). Lie algebras of unbounded derivations. Journal of Functional Analysis. 52(3). 369–384. 19 indexed citations
20.
Goodman, Frederick M.. (1980). Closed derivations in commutative C∗ algebras. Journal of Functional Analysis. 39(3). 308–346. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026