Vincent M. Colapietro
- Philosophy top 2%
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 12
- Philosophy and Literary Analysis 1
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 1
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 3
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 1
-
- Media, Communication, and Education 2
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 1
- Co-authors
- Leon J. Goldstein
- Journals
- The Southern Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Vincent M. Colapietro
19 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Philosophy 127
- History and Philosophy of Science 28
- General Psychology 7
- Literature and Literary Theory 50
- Communication 29
Countries citing papers authored by Vincent M. Colapietro
This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent M. Colapietro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent M. Colapietro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent M. Colapietro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent M. Colapietro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent M. Colapietro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent M. Colapietro. The network helps show where Vincent M. Colapietro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Vincent M. Colapietro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | Conceptual Tension: Essays on Kinship, Politics, and Individualism | 2014 | 0 |
| 4 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 10 | Peirce the contrite fallibilist, convinced pragmaticist, and critical commonsensist | 1996 | 1 |
| 11 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 20 | PEIRCE'S SEMIOTIC APPROACH TO MIND | 1983 | 0 |
About Vincent M. Colapietro
Vincent M. Colapietro is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (12 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Philosophy and Literary Analysis (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (127 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations) and Communication (29 citations). Vincent M. Colapietro has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Leon J. Goldstein. Their work appears in journals such as The Southern Journal of Philosophy, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, Philosophy and literature and The Monist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.