G. J. Warnock

1.3k citations
38 papers · 352 indexed · h-index 9

G. J. Warnock

26 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

G. J. Warnock
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Philosophy 128
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • General Psychology 7
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
Replace Raziel Abelson with:
Raziel Abelson United States
Martín Steinmann
Herbert W. Schneider United States
Daniel S. Robinson
Edith Hamilton United States
George Pitcher Australia
B C Plato United Kingdom
Henry B. Veatch United States
Leslie Stevenson United Kingdom
Thomas C. Brickhouse United States
G. J. Warnock relative to Raziel Abelson United States Raziel Abelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Raziel Abelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. J. Warnock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. J. Warnock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. J. Warnock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. J. Warnock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. J. Warnock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. J. Warnock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. J. Warnock. The network helps show where G. J. Warnock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside G. J. Warnock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. J. Warnock Line = papers co-authored together G. J. Warnock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1993104
2 19862
3
Sentido y percepción
19812
4 19800
5 19809
6 19781
7 19761
8
Sinn und Sinneserfahrung = Sense and sensibilia
19752
9 197310
10 19720
11 197129
12 19700
13
The Principles of Human Knowledge: Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous
19692
14 19652
15 19623
16 19621
17 19610
18
POPPER, K. R. -The Logic of Scientific Discovery
196018
19 19510
20 19511

About G. J. Warnock

G. J. Warnock is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Law, having authored 38 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper) and Historical Studies of British Isles (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (128 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations). G. J. Warnock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Cerf, W. D. Hudson, Bede Rundle, Herbert Morris, Alan R. White, George Berkeley, D. M. Armstrong, John Austin, J. O. Urmson and A. A. Luce. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, Mind, Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026