Paul Helm
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
- Philosophy 29
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 22
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 8
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 5
- History 11
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 10
- Co-authors
- Thomas V. Morris (2 shared papers)Oliver D. Crisp (1 shared paper)Adrian Thatcher (1 shared paper)George N. Schlesinger (1 shared paper)Jonathan Edwards (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Religious Studies (11 papers)Philosophy (6 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (5 papers)Analysis (4 papers)Mind (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Paul Helm
51 papers receiving 215 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Philosophy 162
- Religious studies 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
- History 48
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Helm
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Helm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Helm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Helm. The network helps show where Paul Helm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Paul Helm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 41 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 9 | Jonathan Edwards : philosophical theologian | 2003 | 7 |
| 10 | Faith with Reason | 2000 | 7 |
| 11 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 19 | Faith and reason | 1999 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 3 |
About Paul Helm
Paul Helm is a scholar working on Philosophy, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 74 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (22 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (10 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (8 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (162 citations), Religious studies (40 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), History (48 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations). Paul Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Thomas V. Morris, Oliver D. Crisp, Adrian Thatcher, George N. Schlesinger and Jonathan Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.