Philip L. Quinn
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Marilyn McCord AdamsBonnie KentStephanie W. Y. ChanNicholas WolterstorffWilliam P. AlstonRobert AudiAlasdair MacIntyreAnthony Rudd
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (24 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip L. Quinn
63 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Philosophy 407
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Political Science and International Relations 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 69
- Clinical Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Philip L. Quinn
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip L. Quinn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip L. Quinn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip L. Quinn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip L. Quinn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip L. Quinn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip L. Quinn. The network helps show where Philip L. Quinn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip L. Quinn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip L. Quinn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip L. Quinn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip L. Quinn. Philip L. Quinn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Two Views of Virtue: Absolute Relativism and Relative Absolutism | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 86 | |
| 7 | The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity | 17 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Abelard on Atonement: Nothing Unintelligible, Arbitrary, Illogical, or Immoral about It' | 2 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Philip L. Quinn
Philip L. Quinn is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Religious studies, having authored 72 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (24 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (407 citations), General Psychology (18 citations) and Religious studies (56 citations). Philip L. Quinn has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn McCord Adams, Bonnie Kent, Stephanie W. Y. Chan, Nicholas Wolterstorff, William P. Alston, Robert Audi, Alasdair MacIntyre, Anthony Rudd, Peter Achinstein and Christian Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, European Economic Review and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.