George Kellas

1.8k total citations
63 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

George Kellas is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, George Kellas has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in George Kellas's work include Reading and Literacy Development (24 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers). George Kellas is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (24 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (10 papers). George Kellas collaborates with scholars based in United States. George Kellas's co-authors include Stephen T. Paul, Greg B. Simpson, Alfred A. Baumeister, F. Richard Ferraro, Paul Whitney, Carl E. McFarland, Charley McCauley, Edward M. Duncan, Earl C. Butterfield and Tara McKay and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

In The Last Decade

George Kellas

62 papers receiving 968 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Kellas United States 18 741 667 415 206 85 63 1.1k
Susan D. Lima United States 18 1.0k 1.4× 674 1.0× 555 1.3× 154 0.7× 96 1.1× 23 1.4k
Susan D. Sergent-Marshall United States 7 763 1.0× 618 0.9× 233 0.6× 221 1.1× 123 1.4× 8 1.0k
Robert F. Stanners United States 13 611 0.8× 566 0.8× 283 0.7× 96 0.5× 71 0.8× 32 913
Alexander Pollatsek United States 10 1.1k 1.5× 1.0k 1.6× 400 1.0× 237 1.2× 67 0.8× 10 1.4k
Margrit Glaser Germany 4 1.0k 1.4× 513 0.8× 535 1.3× 52 0.3× 159 1.9× 5 1.3k
Leslie C. Twilley Canada 9 438 0.6× 480 0.7× 208 0.5× 141 0.7× 40 0.5× 13 700
Nancy S. McCarrell United States 10 273 0.4× 423 0.6× 325 0.8× 121 0.6× 135 1.6× 11 804
Thomas Pechmann Germany 16 989 1.3× 805 1.2× 426 1.0× 301 1.5× 66 0.8× 29 1.4k
Carla J. Posnansky United States 10 407 0.5× 346 0.5× 219 0.5× 53 0.3× 65 0.8× 18 578
Carlton T. James United States 10 412 0.6× 361 0.5× 196 0.5× 104 0.5× 118 1.4× 19 639

Countries citing papers authored by George Kellas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Kellas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Kellas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Kellas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Kellas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Kellas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Kellas. The network helps show where George Kellas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Kellas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Kellas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Kellas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Kellas. George Kellas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paul, Stephen T. & George Kellas. (2004). A Time Course View of Sentence Priming Effects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 33(5). 383–405. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kellas, George, et al.. (2003). Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition. 31(8). 1302–1315. 12 indexed citations
3.
Kellas, George, et al.. (2000). The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition. 28(2). 236–252. 30 indexed citations
4.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1999). Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 6(3). 511–517. 20 indexed citations
5.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1999). Contextual Strength Modulates the Subordinate Bias Effect: Reply to Rayner, Binder, and Duffy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 52(4). 853–855. 6 indexed citations
6.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition. 26(5). 979–1001. 61 indexed citations
7.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1995). Scope of Word Meaning Activation During Sentence Processing by Young and Older Adults. Experimental Aging Research. 21(2). 123–142. 30 indexed citations
8.
Ferraro, F. Richard & George Kellas. (1992). Age-related Changes in the Effects of Target Orientation on Word Recognition. Journal of Gerontology. 47(4). P279–P280. 10 indexed citations
9.
Paul, Stephen T., et al.. (1992). Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 18(4). 703–717. 66 indexed citations
10.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 14(4). 601–609. 114 indexed citations
11.
Kellas, George, F. Richard Ferraro, & Greg B. Simpson. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 14(4). 601–609. 64 indexed citations
12.
Whitney, Paul, et al.. (1985). Semantic activation of noun concepts in context.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 11(1). 126–135. 52 indexed citations
13.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1978). Typicality as a dimension of encoding.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory. 4(1). 78–85. 32 indexed citations
14.
Ashcraft, Mark H., et al.. (1975). Rehearsal and retrieval processes in free recall of categorized lists. Memory & Cognition. 3(5). 506–512. 2 indexed citations
15.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1974). Encoding and retrieval processes in normal children and retarded adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 17(1). 177–185. 17 indexed citations
16.
Ashcraft, Mark H. & George Kellas. (1974). Organization in normal and retarded children: Temporal aspects of storage and retrieval.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 103(3). 502–508. 7 indexed citations
17.
McFarland, Carl E., et al.. (1974). Category similarity, instance dominance, and categorization time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 13(6). 698–708. 12 indexed citations
18.
Kellas, George, et al.. (1969). Response learning and the paired-associate performance of mental retardates.. PubMed. 74(2). 273–8. 3 indexed citations
19.
Kellas, George. (1969). Effects of preparatory intervals and stimulus intensity on reaction times of normal and retarded individuals.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 68(2, Pt.1). 303–307. 3 indexed citations
20.
Baumeister, Anna, et al.. (1965). THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS INTENSITY AND INTELLIGENCE UPON REACTION TIME.. PubMed. 69. 526–30. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026