George E. Forsythe
- Numerical Analysis top 0.5%
- Differential Equations and Numerical Methods 9
- Numerical methods for differential equations 9
- Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research 8
- Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations 3
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 0.2%
- Matrix Theory and Algorithms 12
- semigroups and automata theory 4
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 4
- Computational Mechanics top 0.5%
- Applied Mathematics top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
-
- Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems 3
George E. Forsythe
69 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
- Numerical Analysis 1.1k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.4k
- Computational Mechanics 1.1k
- Applied Mathematics 467
- Mathematical Physics 287
Countries citing papers authored by George E. Forsythe
This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Forsythe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Forsythe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Forsythe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Forsythe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Forsythe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Forsythe. The network helps show where George E. Forsythe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside George E. Forsythe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer methods for mathematical computationsbreakdown → | 1977 | 1985 |
| 2 | 1973 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1972 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 76 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1962 | 135 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 265 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 419 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 73 | |
| 13 | Finite-Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equationsbreakdown → | 1961 | 1029 |
| 14 | 1959 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1956 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1955 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1954 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1952 | 8 |
About George E. Forsythe
George E. Forsythe is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Architecture, Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Applications, having authored 74 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (9 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (8 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (3 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (1.1k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.4k citations), Computational Mechanics (1.1k citations), Applied Mathematics (467 citations) and Mathematical Physics (287 citations). George E. Forsythe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include C Moler, Michael A. Malcolm, Wolfgang Wasow, W. Nachbar, G. L. Watson, Preston C. Hammer, Peter Henrici, E. G. Straus, Niklaus Wirth and Gene H. Golub. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Communications of the ACM, SIAM Review, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Biometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.