George Becker

902 citations
42 papers · 390 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

George Becker

30 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

George Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Literature and Literary Theory 46
  • General Psychology 5
  • Music 12
Replace Richard C. McCleary with:
Richard C. McCleary
David Novitz New Zealand
Beverley Southgate United Kingdom
Gerhard Charles Rump
Elmer H. Duncan United States
Eva Schaper United Kingdom
George Santayana
Donald M. Lowe
Colin Lyas Ghana
Krystyna Pomorska Poland
George Becker relative to Richard C. McCleary Richard C. McCleary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Richard C. McCleary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Becker. The network helps show where George Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside George Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Becker Line = papers co-authored together George Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197968
2 201453
3 200150
4 198030
5 199725
6 196422
7 198316
8 198413
9 198013
10 200012
11 199112
12 198710
13 19829
14 19638
15 19817
16 19926
17 19896
18 19865
19 19743
20 19893

About George Becker

George Becker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (46 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Music (12 citations). George Becker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marcello Truzzi, Miriam Allott, Catherine B. Silver, Eva Etzioni‐Halevy, James C. Kaufman, Michael J. Lowis, Dean Keith Simonton, Dennis K. Kinney, Dione Healey and Maja Djikic. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Sociology, Review of Religious Research, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact