Ted Goertzel

42 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Belief in Conspiracy Theories 1994 · 679 citations
6790+10+21Years since publication200400600

Peers

Ted Goertzel
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Communication 173
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
  • Health 162
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 277
  • Literature and Literary Theory 119
Replace Anthony N. Doob with:
Anthony N. Doob Canada
Neil Vidmar United States
Annette C. Baier United States
Erich Goode United States
Carolyn L. Funk United States
David B. Burrell United States
Eric D. Knowles United States
Daniel M. Ogilvie United States
William G. Perry United States
Roy J. Eidelson United States
Ted Goertzel relative to Anthony N. Doob Canada Anthony N. Doob's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Anthony N. Doob · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Goertzel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Goertzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Goertzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Goertzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Goertzel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Goertzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Goertzel. The network helps show where Ted Goertzel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ted Goertzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Goertzel Line = papers co-authored together Ted Goertzel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Hit paper breakdown →
1994679
2 2010101
3 199084
4 198484
5 201083
6
Three hundred eminent personalities
197865
7
Understanding Big Government: The Programme Approach
198465
8 199155
9 201644
10 200938
11 199129
12 197228
13 198025
14 197224
15 201420
16 199619
17 198718
18 199118
19 197116
20 197814

About Ted Goertzel

Ted Goertzel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Education and Military Integration (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (173 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.0k citations), Health (162 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (277 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (119 citations). Ted Goertzel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Myra Bluebond‐Langner, Ben Goertzel, Dean Keith Simonton, Richard Rose, Seth D. Baum, Victor Goertzel, Túlio Kahn, Marvin E. Olsen, Kenneth Maxwell and Daniel J. Kevles. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Political Psychology, Social Forces, The Journal of Social Psychology and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact