Gareth Rees
Impact in
- Ecology top 10%
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Marine animal studies overview
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
- Ecology 5
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology 5
- Marine animal studies overview 1
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 1
-
- Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Simon Kelly (4 shared papers)Stuart Bearhop (2 shared papers)Robbie A. McDonald (2 shared papers)Matthew J. Perkins (2 shared papers)F. J. Frank van Veen (2 shared papers)Rudolf Krska (1 shared paper)Colin Crews (1 shared paper)Peter Gasson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (1 paper)Food Control (1 paper)Food Additives and Contaminants Part B (1 paper)Methods in Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Forests (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
Gareth Rees
7 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Ecology 183
- Paleontology 40
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 40
- Geography, Planning and Development 18
- Global and Planetary Change 52
Countries citing papers authored by Gareth Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Gareth Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gareth Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gareth Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gareth Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gareth Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gareth Rees. The network helps show where Gareth Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Gareth Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 113 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 19 |
About Gareth Rees
Gareth Rees is a scholar working on Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Organic Chemistry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Isotope Analysis in Ecology (5 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (2 papers), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (1 paper) and Plant and fungal interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (183 citations), Paleontology (40 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (40 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (18 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (52 citations). Gareth Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Simon Kelly, Stuart Bearhop, Robbie A. McDonald, Matthew J. Perkins, F. J. Frank van Veen, Rudolf Krska, Colin Crews, Peter Gasson, Warwick Anderson and Markus Boner. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Food Control, Food Additives and Contaminants Part B, Methods in Ecology and Evolution and Forests.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.