Myrtle P. Shock

747 total citations
24 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

Myrtle P. Shock is a scholar working on History, Plant Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Myrtle P. Shock has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in History, 10 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Myrtle P. Shock's work include Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (18 papers), Indigenous Health and Education (7 papers) and Cassava research and cyanide (7 papers). Myrtle P. Shock is often cited by papers focused on Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (18 papers), Indigenous Health and Education (7 papers) and Cassava research and cyanide (7 papers). Myrtle P. Shock collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom. Myrtle P. Shock's co-authors include Eduardo Góes Neves, Jennifer Watling, Fernando Ozório de Almeida, Paulo Eduardo de Oliveira, Francisco Pugliese, Lautaro Hilbert, Elizabeth Ann Veasey, Bronwen S. Whitney, José Iriarte and Claide de Paula Moraes and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Myrtle P. Shock

22 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Myrtle P. Shock Brazil 10 208 141 72 68 62 24 362
Fernando Ozório de Almeida Brazil 7 185 0.9× 80 0.6× 74 1.0× 48 0.7× 38 0.6× 20 265
Daiana Travassos Alves United Kingdom 7 204 1.0× 92 0.7× 45 0.6× 92 1.4× 77 1.2× 8 369
Lautaro Hilbert Brazil 6 145 0.7× 94 0.7× 29 0.4× 75 1.1× 67 1.1× 8 277
Gaspar Morcote-Ríos Colombia 8 119 0.6× 90 0.6× 38 0.5× 62 0.9× 45 0.7× 11 263
Juliana Lins Brazil 4 140 0.7× 73 0.5× 44 0.6× 24 0.4× 28 0.5× 7 276
Javier Ruiz-Pérez Spain 7 89 0.4× 60 0.4× 22 0.3× 118 1.7× 51 0.8× 15 268
Bruno Garcia Luize Brazil 5 100 0.5× 52 0.4× 30 0.4× 24 0.4× 19 0.3× 11 267
Sarah Elliott United Kingdom 9 73 0.4× 65 0.5× 17 0.2× 142 2.1× 61 1.0× 20 315
Maria C. Bruno United States 11 111 0.5× 64 0.5× 28 0.4× 303 4.5× 198 3.2× 31 486
Karol Chandler-Ezell United States 9 97 0.5× 222 1.6× 16 0.2× 322 4.7× 269 4.3× 13 585

Countries citing papers authored by Myrtle P. Shock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Myrtle P. Shock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Myrtle P. Shock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Myrtle P. Shock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Myrtle P. Shock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Myrtle P. Shock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Myrtle P. Shock. The network helps show where Myrtle P. Shock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Myrtle P. Shock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Myrtle P. Shock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Myrtle P. Shock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Myrtle P. Shock. Myrtle P. Shock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lins, Juliana, et al.. (2025). Thinking with Amazonian Indigenous Peoples to expand ideas on domestication. People and Nature. 7(3). 560–574. 2 indexed citations
2.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2021). Flautas, banhas e caxiris. Revista de Arqueologia. 34(3). 255–282.
4.
Casas, Alejandro, et al.. (2021). The Taming of Psidium guajava: Natural and Cultural History of a Neotropical Fruit. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12. 714763–714763. 22 indexed citations
5.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2020). Pluralidade dos acervos epistêmicos na Amazônia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33(3). 306–329.
6.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2020). Balaios de plantas e animais. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33(3). 279–305. 1 indexed citations
7.
Watling, Jennifer, et al.. (2020). Arqueobotânica de ocupações ceramistas na Cachoeira do Teotônio. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Humanas. 15(2). 12 indexed citations
8.
Rizzutto, M. A., Sandra Maria Carmello‐Guerreiro, Carlos Sato Baraldi Dias, et al.. (2020). A correlation analysis of Light Microscopy and X-ray MicroCT imaging methods applied to archaeological plant remains’ morphological attributes visualization. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 15105–15105. 13 indexed citations
9.
Béarez, Philippe, et al.. (2019). Pre-Hispanic fishing practices in interfluvial Amazonia: Zooarchaeological evidence from managed landscapes on the Llanos de Mojos savanna. PLoS ONE. 14(5). e0214638–e0214638. 25 indexed citations
10.
Rizzutto, M. A., Jennifer Watling, Myrtle P. Shock, et al.. (2019). Study of plant remains from a fluvial shellmound (Monte Castelo, RO, Brazil) using the X-ray MicroCT imaging technique. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports. 26. 101902–101902. 9 indexed citations
11.
Watling, Jennifer, et al.. (2018). Direct archaeological evidence for Southwestern Amazonia as an early plant domestication and food production centre. PLoS ONE. 13(7). e0199868–e0199868. 109 indexed citations
12.
Hilbert, Lautaro, Eduardo Góes Neves, Francisco Pugliese, et al.. (2017). Evidence for mid-Holocene rice domestication in the Americas. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1(11). 1693–1698. 86 indexed citations
13.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2016). VESTÍGIOS MACROBOTÂNICOS CARBONIZADOS NA AMAZÔNIA CENTRAL: O QUE ELES NOS DIZEM SOBRE AS PLANTAS NA PRÉ-HISTÓRIA?. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 366–385. 2 indexed citations
14.
Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2016). Writing Scientific Journal Manuscripts in English. HortScience. 51(4). 316–319. 2 indexed citations
15.
Shock, Clinton C., Erik B.G. Feibert, Nancy L. Shaw, Myrtle P. Shock, & Lamont D. Saunders. (2015). Irrigation to Enhance Native Seed Production for Great Basin Restoration. Natural Areas Journal. 35(1). 74–82. 3 indexed citations
16.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2013). A Chronology of the Introduction of Domesticated Plants in Central Brazil. Tipití Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America. 11(2). 52–59. 8 indexed citations
17.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2013). Recuperação de macrovestígios em sítios arqueológicos na Amazônia: nova proposta metodológica para estudos arqueobotânicos. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Humanas. 8(3). 759–769. 5 indexed citations
18.
Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2012). Cultivation and Irrigation of Fernleaf Biscuitroot (Lomatium dissectum) for Seed Production. HortScience. 47(10). 1525–1528. 3 indexed citations
19.
Shock, Myrtle P.. (2010). Holocene hunter-gatherer plant use and foraging choice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(2). 162–163. 9 indexed citations
20.
Hassan, Ibrahim Hayatu, et al.. (1999). PHARMACOGNOSTIC STUDIES OF THE STEM OF CARRISA EDULIS. Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine. 3(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026