Markus Boner

955 total citations
19 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

Markus Boner is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology and Paleontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Markus Boner has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in Markus Boner's work include Isotope Analysis in Ecology (15 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (7 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (7 papers). Markus Boner is often cited by papers focused on Isotope Analysis in Ecology (15 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (7 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (7 papers). Markus Boner collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Italy. Markus Boner's co-authors include Carsten Fauhl‐Hassek, Andreas Roßmann, Federica Camin, Simon Kelly, Luana Bontempo, Janet Riedl, John C. Hermanson, Andrew J. Lowe, Alex C. Wiedenhoeft and Gerald Koch and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Markus Boner

18 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Markus Boner Germany 10 339 229 148 112 83 19 639
Xiaoling Zhang China 13 41 0.1× 152 0.7× 14 0.1× 74 0.7× 9 0.1× 28 690
Pasquale Marino Italy 14 30 0.1× 79 0.3× 19 0.1× 35 0.3× 14 0.2× 43 521
Mark Nesbitt United Kingdom 16 79 0.2× 83 0.4× 37 0.3× 234 2.1× 2 0.0× 52 853
Jacques Gamisans France 10 40 0.1× 50 0.2× 33 0.2× 22 0.2× 9 0.1× 40 391
Matthias Kropf Austria 19 139 0.4× 337 1.5× 11 0.1× 29 0.3× 5 0.1× 41 1.2k
Sarah Ivorra France 19 111 0.3× 154 0.7× 54 0.4× 176 1.6× 52 1.2k
David E. Giannasi United States 17 104 0.3× 447 2.0× 11 0.1× 69 0.6× 2 0.0× 52 1.1k
Thomas A. Zanoni United States 14 190 0.6× 251 1.1× 26 0.2× 32 0.3× 4 0.0× 67 1.0k
P. Baradat France 15 148 0.4× 290 1.3× 225 1.5× 8 0.1× 2 0.0× 37 943
Eduardo Estrada‐Castillón Mexico 19 114 0.3× 95 0.4× 10 0.1× 170 1.5× 6 0.1× 113 905

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Boner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Boner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Boner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Boner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Boner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Boner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Boner. The network helps show where Markus Boner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Boner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Boner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Boner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Boner. Markus Boner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Truszkowski, Jakub, Markus Boner, Caspar Chater, et al.. (2024). A framework for tracing timber following the Ukraine invasion. Nature Plants. 10(3). 390–401. 5 indexed citations
2.
Ludwig, Arne, Leonardo Congiu, Joern Gessner, et al.. (2023). Poaching and illegal trade of Danube sturgeons. Current Biology. 33(22). R1184–R1185.
3.
Congiu, Leonardo, et al.. (2023). Identification and tracking of sturgeons and paddlefish products in trade: Implications for trade control and biodiversity management. Aquaculture. 574. 739708–739708. 7 indexed citations
4.
Gasson, Peter, et al.. (2022). Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis for the Comparison of Timber From Two Forest Concessions in Gabon. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 4. 6 indexed citations
5.
Nelson, Daniel B., et al.. (2022). Constraining parameter uncertainty for predicting oxygen and hydrogen isotope values in fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 73(14). 5016–5032. 10 indexed citations
6.
Gasson, Peter, et al.. (2022). A Case Study to Establish a Basis for Evaluating Geographic Origin Claims of Timber From the Solomon Islands Using Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 4. 2 indexed citations
7.
Nelson, Daniel B., et al.. (2021). Using plant physiological stable oxygen isotope models to counter food fraud. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 17314–17314. 12 indexed citations
8.
Chun, Kwok Pan, et al.. (2021). Assessment of multiple stable isotopes for tracking regional and organic authenticity of plant products in Hesse, Germany. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies. 57(3). 281–300. 14 indexed citations
9.
Gasson, Peter, et al.. (2020). The Development and Use of Isoscapes to Determine the Geographical Origin of Quercus spp. in the United States. Forests. 11(8). 862–862. 18 indexed citations
10.
Joergensen, Rainer Georg, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of organic sunflower fertilization using δ15N values. Organic Agriculture. 9(4). 365–372. 5 indexed citations
11.
Schwemmer, Philipp, Moritz Mercker, Harald Asmus, et al.. (2018). Decreasing δ13C and δ15N values in four coastal species at different trophic levels indicate a fundamental food-web shift in the southern North and Baltic Seas between 1988 and 2016. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190(8). 461–461. 10 indexed citations
12.
Horacek, M., et al.. (2018). Comment on: Developing forensic tools for an African timber: […], by Vlam et al., 2018. Biological Conservation. 226. 333–334. 3 indexed citations
13.
Camin, Federica, Markus Boner, Luana Bontempo, et al.. (2017). Stable isotope techniques for verifying the declared geographical origin of food in legal cases. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 61. 176–187. 159 indexed citations
14.
Schingen, Mona van, Thomas Ziegler, Markus Boner, et al.. (2016). Can isotope markers differentiate between wild and captive reptile populations? A case study based on crocodile lizards ( Shinisaurus crocodilurus ) from Vietnam. Global Ecology and Conservation. 6. 232–241. 26 indexed citations
15.
Ziegler, Stefan, Stefan Merker, Bruno Streit, Markus Boner, & Dorrit E. Jacob. (2016). Towards understanding isotope variability in elephant ivory to establish isotopic profiling and source-area determination. Biological Conservation. 197. 154–163. 32 indexed citations
16.
Dormontt, Eleanor E., Markus Boner, Gerhard Breulmann, et al.. (2015). Forensic timber identification: It's time to integrate disciplines to combat illegal logging. Biological Conservation. 191. 790–798. 176 indexed citations
17.
Zimmermann, Benno F., I. Janzik, Siegfried Jahnke, et al.. (2013). Intrinsic isotopic 13C labelling of polyphenols. Food Chemistry. 141(3). 2582–2590. 8 indexed citations
18.
Weller, Philipp, et al.. (2011). Isotopic Fingerprinting for the Authenticity Control of Crop Protection Active Compounds using the Representative Insecticide Fipronil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 59(9). 4365–4370. 7 indexed citations
19.
Boner, Markus, et al.. (2004). Stable isotope variation as a tool to trace the authenticity of beef. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 378(2). 301–310. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026